- Joined
- Nov 30, 2011
- Messages
- 82
- Motherboard
- X99D2
- CPU
- i7-6900K
- Graphics
- RX 580
- Mac
- Mobile Phone
From my own experience I can tell that I am using "ASUS MultiCore Enhancement" from almost the beginning of this board hackintosh story and didn't noticed anything bad about it! Also using VT-D without DART=0 until now and all was good in my case, virtualisation is a must in my case so I had to use this vt-d always and didn't know what the dart=0 is for.
I have tried reimplement nvidia again using only the AGDPFix and unfortunately it didn't work in my case (GTX970) as I am stuck at boot with gioscreenlockstate, uninstalling and reinstalling drivers didn't help so I still have to use the (2) nvidia fixup and libvalfix kexts in my efi
In my experience without any additional patches the performance in geekbench scores (24k) is about 10k lower than expected in my config, when I add an xcpm_assert_wrmsr patch to the config.plist the I am getting extra 10k (34k) without any impact on stability of the system, idle cpu speeds are much higher as it looks like it won't go below 2Ghz at all when without this patch the lowest I get is 1.2Ghz, temperature of the cpus changed only a small bit and still oscillating around 30C idle up to 85C under full load (rendering all cores) all of this tested with CPU overclocked to 4.2Ghz!
Would be great if someone here with 6900K overclocked to 4.2Ghz share with me a geekbench scores to compare.
Asus X99 Deluxe II, 32Gb ram @2666Mhz
All above is my personal experience and I don't encourage anyone to use any of my suggestion but would love to hear your opinion about it if someone of you did some of the above tests
I have tried reimplement nvidia again using only the AGDPFix and unfortunately it didn't work in my case (GTX970) as I am stuck at boot with gioscreenlockstate, uninstalling and reinstalling drivers didn't help so I still have to use the (2) nvidia fixup and libvalfix kexts in my efi
In my experience without any additional patches the performance in geekbench scores (24k) is about 10k lower than expected in my config, when I add an xcpm_assert_wrmsr patch to the config.plist the I am getting extra 10k (34k) without any impact on stability of the system, idle cpu speeds are much higher as it looks like it won't go below 2Ghz at all when without this patch the lowest I get is 1.2Ghz, temperature of the cpus changed only a small bit and still oscillating around 30C idle up to 85C under full load (rendering all cores) all of this tested with CPU overclocked to 4.2Ghz!
Would be great if someone here with 6900K overclocked to 4.2Ghz share with me a geekbench scores to compare.
Asus X99 Deluxe II, 32Gb ram @2666Mhz
All above is my personal experience and I don't encourage anyone to use any of my suggestion but would love to hear your opinion about it if someone of you did some of the above tests