When people ask if the new Navi2 are worth the upgrade, are they asking in reference to the MSRP or the actual market prices that these GPU's are currently going for? Because there is at least $1000 discrepancy in there, and at to me that is a pretty big difference between "it's worth it" to "it's way overpriced for what you get"
I'm a professional video editor
I make a living from the hardware I purchase
The price of the product is not so much the matter in the purchase decision
If I did not know how to make an Hackintosh then surely I would buy a Mac Pro 2019
Then everything there is 10 times more expensive
The question is whether when I have an old RX VEGA 64 or Radeon VII
Will I see better performance with the RX 6900 XT ?
No numbers in the benchmarks
But real-world Work
With new and hard-to-encode files
And the answer is not always clear
Because we've already seen an i7 processor 8700k at $ 300
Beats in its performance 18Core processor (7-9-10 generation) at 1000$
in video Editing Thanks to intel uhd and quick sync technology
As I wrote in the previous post
that my Dual Radeon VII does not bring more performance
in Davinci Resolve or FCPX
So the question is more professional Than financially
