pastrychef
Moderator
- Joined
- May 29, 2013
- Messages
- 19,458
- Motherboard
- Mac Studio - Mac13,1
- CPU
- M1 Max
- Graphics
- 32 Core
- Mac
- Classic Mac
- Mobile Phone
My Two cents ...
The original x86 Mac Mini used to start at $499.00 for the basic version and was a cheap way for new users to get on the OSX band wagon and was pivotal in increasing the Mac/OSX user base vs Windows.
This new Mac Mini starts at $799 for the i3 version with IGPU only graphics 8GB of RAM and soldered on 128GB SSD
I cant think of any reason why anyone would want to pay so much for such an underpowered machine.
Just about anyone on these forums could build a band new equivalent machine running Mojave 10.14.1 for under $400
Which means that your paying $399 for a Space Grey case made from recycled aluminium.
This is a total rip off with built in obsolescence, only Apple Fan Boys/Girls would buy such a thing.
Apple have truly lost their way ...
Cheers
Jay
I disagree. I feel the old Mac Minis had far more obsolescence built in. Sure you could upgrade the RAM and storage... But what else? They came with extremely anemic CPUs and no real option for GPU. Storage was upgradeable but limited to SATA3 drives. RAM was upgradeable but only to 16GB.
- anemic CPU
- RAM. User upgradeable to 16GB
- Storage upgradeable to via SATA or Thunderbolt 2.
- Thunderbolt 2 unrealistic for eGPU use.
The new Mac Minis have far more powerful CPUs. User upgradeable RAM to 64GB. Honestly, the only thing that truly can't be upgraded is the CPU.
- Far more powerful CPUs
- RAM. User upgradeable to 64GB
- Internal storage no upgradeable but Thunderbolt 3 allows for NVMe level speeds. If you want SATA3, that's possible via Thunderbolt too.
- Thunderbolt 3 allow for realistic eGPU
- 10GBase-T
Is it possible to build a hack for less money? Of course, but there are many who don't want to be bothered with hackintoshing. There's something to be said for the plug-and-go proposition. When compared with what HP charges for a similar system, there's practically no difference so it's not really outrageous.
Last edited: