Contribute
Register

[SUCCESS] Gigabyte Designare Z390 (Thunderbolt 3) + i7-9700K + AMD RX 580

RX 6600, or RX 6800/6900 depending on budget.


I don't quit understand your airflow model. As shown, the NH-D15 exhausts to the two fans at the top. But intake is blocked by the GPU.
I would rotate the cooler by 90° to exhaust to the back, and back fan. The top may even be closed. How's the case intake?

I have also been looking at the photo for a while. I don't get the airflow either...
Haha, I get that it’s a little unorthodox. My simple thinking led me to this. Hot air rises, and the NH-D15 is open. So instead of fan’s pushing air in, and fan’s sucking air out, I figured that this simple sucking air out would be sufficient. And it does, even without blowing the fan’s at max speed. On the contrary, I have set the fan’s on a very silent curve. The fan inside and above the Noctua are set to the cpu temp, the other fan to a much warmer sensor. It works, but I would believe you if you said that this is negative for the gpu. The case is a Fractal Design Meshify C.

This was the original setup. But here I was blowing the NH-D15 air to a much smaller fan. This seemed counter productive to me. And 5 fans instead of 3 now.

Hackintosh-original.jpg
 
Last edited:
OK. I would put 2 fans for air intake in front, have the CPU fan blow to the back, and have 1x 14 cm fan blowing out in the back.

I had 1x14cm Fractal front intake(low is better), 1 Noctua CPU fan blowing to the back(I also have a D15), 1x Fractal fan blowing out behind the D15 at the back in my former i9/RX480 setup. The top of my Fractal case is closed.

For my new(and hotter) 13700k setup, I have put an extra 12-cm intake fan I had lying around in the bottom of my case(I don't have a closed PSU compartiment, it sits in front of my PSU), and I replaced the Fractal front intake fan by a spare Noctua 14cm in the front top position.

Well. My 2c.
 
Haha, I get that it’s a little unorthodox. My simple thinking led me to this. Hot air rises, and the NH-D15 is open. So instead of fan’s pushing air in, and fan’s sucking air out, I figured that this simple sucking air out would be sufficient. And it does, even without blowing the fan’s at max speed. On the contrary, I have set the fan’s on a very silent curve. The fan inside and above the Noctua are set to the cpu temp, the other fan to a much warmer sensor. It works, but I would believe you if you said that this is negative for the gpu. The case is a Fractal Design Meshify C.
OK. So you have a very open case and you're doing a chimney, cold air being sucked at the bottom and rising to exhaust at the top. It seems to work, at least because the NH-D15 is a very big cooler for a not-so-hot CPU.
But the bottom radiator has to draw air from the sides because it is blocked by the GPU, while the top radiator has some air vaguely pushed from the bottom and sucked from the ceiling fans; that's probably not very efficient. And what's happening with the GPU? If it were a workstation-style blower, it would draw its own cool air from the bottom and exhaust hot air through the slot; but a consumer-style double or triple fan just moves air within the case—which means that the CPU cooler actually sucks in warm air raising from the GPU.

This was the original setup. But here I was blowing the NH-D15 air to a much smaller fan. This seemed counter productive to me. And 5 fans instead of 3 now.
What seems counter-productive to me here is the front top fan, taking out cold air which should aim for the CPU.
The 120mm fan acting as exhaust for a 140mm in the cooler can somewhat match by spinning a bit faster.
And in the original setting, the front bottom fan was sending cold air the way of the Z390 chipset (it needs some airflow!) and the GPU.

I'm no cooling expert, but I would suggest a variant of the original setting with the top closed and the bottom front fan moved to the lowest possible position. Simple front-to-back flows:
In the lower half, the front fan pushes air towards the chipset and the GPU fans.
In the upper half, the back fan exhausts warm air from the cooler; you may have an upper front fan expressly pushing cold air towards the cooler, or let the cooler draw its own cold air—it's pretty open. But no "short circuit" from an open top.
3 or 4 fans, and hopefully generally lower temperatures than with the present "chimney" but only experiment could tell.
 
Just ordered another Noctua 14cm 4-pin PWM fan(and another 32GB of RAM for $60). It will replace the 7 year old Fractal exhaust fan in the back of my R5 case.
Noctua's are great, and I don't mind their bordeaux and tan colors. You don't see them inside a closed case anyway.
 
If the next macOS version on Jun 5th still supports x86 then we are good for another year & could probably update to that, unless it was worse than Ventura (I am still on 12.6.5)
 
@CaseySJ

My Gigabyte Z390 Designare hack running Ventura 13.3.1 (a), OC 0.9.2, and a Fenvi T-919 WiFi card had working network connections through WiFi, and both Ethernet ports. Upgrading to Ventura 13.4 today disabled WiFi, and the "lower" Ethernet port (furthest from the two brass WiFi antenna terminals.) The "upper" Ethernet port works.

In System Settings the WiFi button is unselected. Trying to select it immediately returns it to the unselected position. The System doesn't recognize that the Fenvi card is present.

I believe a late beta of 13.4 created network issues for Macs running Little Snitch. I removed Little Snitch from my 13.4 installation, and it made no difference.

The Fenvi T-919 card has been so reliable over previous macOS versions, it's surprising it doesn't work with 13.4. It's not a card failure as booting back into my 13.3.1 (a) backup restores normal networking.

Any ideas what might be the issue?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@CaseySJ

My Gigabyte Z390 Designare hack running Ventura 13.3.1 (a), OC 0.9.2, and a Fenvi T-919 WiFi card had working network connections through WiFi, and both Ethernet ports. Upgrading to Ventura 13.4 today disabled WiFi, and the "lower" Ethernet port (furthest from the two brass WiFi antenna terminals.) The "upper" Ethernet port works.

@CaseySJ

It looks like there is a similar issue with networking based on a post in the Z490 Vision D thread. AppleVTD appears in IORegistryExplorer for me.
 
@CaseySJ

It looks like there is a similar issue with networking based on a post in the Z490 Vision D thread. AppleVTD appears in IORegistryExplorer for me.
I just checked my Z390 Designare with Ventura 13.4:
  • Both on-board Ethernet ports connect and work, but it does take some time to establish a connection (about 20-30 seconds)
  • Fenvi FV-T919 WiFi also connects and works
I have AppleVTD and DisableIoMapperMapping enabled. There are no firewall or virus checkers installed.

Screenshot 2023-05-19 at 9.38.49 AM.png
Screenshot 2023-05-19 at 9.39.59 AM.png

If anyone is experiencing WiFi and/or Ethernet connection problems with Ventura 13.4, please post your experience.
 
Hi, @CaseySJ. I upgrade my Vision D from 16GB RAM to 32GB and lost WiFi. I have 13.3.1 Ventura. If I remove 8GB on any socket WiFi's back, what you think is the issue?
 
Back
Top