Contribute
Register

[GUIDE] Overclock with Z68/Z77, Power Management, SSDT Edits

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good tutorial.
You could demonstrate how to make a SSDT, extracted from the windows or linux?
Or send a tutorial on the subject.
And what would 0x000493E0?
Sorry my English.
 
ok this is the SSDT that i am using but it is not working i want to overclock to 42 what do i need to change???
 

Attachments

  • SSDT.aml
    988 bytes · Views: 140
ramirorobles
philz uses a ssdt_pr.aml renamed ssdt.aml
there are changes in power (mW) = 0x000493E0
But I do not know how to get these powers.
 
the multi beast one is not working on my system
 
Joker77 said:
ramirorobles
philz uses a ssdt_pr.aml renamed ssdt.aml
there are changes in power (mW) = 0x000493E0
But I do not know how to get these powers.

Only real way to get the power states is to extract your own SSDT. Which I'll probably write something up to do. In all honesty it's a moot thing as I don't think AppleIntelCPU uses it at all.
 
Very nice guide!

I'm stable at 4.6mhz
i7 2600k (cooling with Termallight arrow)
VID: + 0.02v

Geekbench: around 15000
During 10-15 min on Geekbench Stress Test i get on HWmonitor:
x46 4554Mhz 1.32 Vcore
CPU cores 49 to 63 Celsius

My question is: which would be an i7 safe temperature?

thank you!
 
sumbutrule said:
Very nice guide!

I'm stable at 4.6mhz
i7 2600k (cooling with Termallight arrow)
VID: + 0.02v

Geekbench: around 15000
During 10-15 min on Geekbench Stress Test i get on HWmonitor:
x46 4554Mhz 1.32 Vcore
CPU cores 49 to 63 Celsius

My question is: which would be an i7 safe temperature?

thank you!


Geekbench is not a stress test. If anything it only taxes it at 100% for a few seconds... Use Prime95 if you only use OSX on your machine. If all the threads (all the windows not just the one on top) doesn't pump out an error, and your at those temps your fine!
 
Silly question, and I think I may already know the answer, but thought I'd ask to make sure.

I'm planning on extracting and editing the SSDT on my Z68XP-UD4.

I understand that if you overclock the system - adding higher p-states - you lose the lower p-states.

Is it necessary to have a p-state entry for every sequential 100Mhz? Or could one instead remove a few from the middle to ensure lower idle. Would that result in compilation errors?

I prefer a low idle, but I'd also like it to ramp up!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top