Z690 Chipset Motherboards and Alder Lake CPU

[AndyKramer]

The multi-core score is lower than single core ? How is that possible ?

View attachment 534460

You are right, there must be something going on. I looked further and found this :

 

[AndyKramer]

That’s not impressive, my Ryzen crushes that multi-core score.

How come? on Geekbench I don't see AMD Ryzen 5 3600X going anywhere more than 1291 Single-Core Score/7226 Multi-Core Score..
Could you run Geekbench and share the result with us?

 

[wxz8506]

Are you able to reach the installer screen properly now?

The Big Sur system has been installed, but the 2.5G wired network card on the motherboard has not been driven successfully. In the system report, there is no information in the PCI and Ethernet cards

 

[craighazan]

How come? on Geekbench I don't see AMD Ryzen 5 3600X going anywhere more than 1291 Single-Core Score/7226 Multi-Core Score..
Could you run Geekbench and share the result with us?

I would love to, hmm interesting!. the links below in my signature if you want to check it out for yourself.

 

[Middleman]

Thank you! Get rest

Just found this on Geekbench website, with Z690 AQUA OC and Intel Core i9-12900K on windows 10.
I think it's impressive.

It is possible.

That happened with my setup when it was set to only 8 cores, no e-cores, no HT and XMP was turned off. I had about 3700 on the multi core(worst result so far). With the settings optimised, it is now around 11000. As it goes I’m still optimising it (ie. I know it can reach 13,000).

 

[Middleman]

The Big Sur system has been installed, but the 2.5G wired network card on the motherboard has not been driven successfully. In the system report, there is no information in the PCI and Ethernet cards

It depends which version of Big Sur you are using. If using Big Sur 11.4 or Monterey you remove all kexts and I-225V kernel patches because it is natively supported. Below that, you either enable Vit9696’s I-225V kernel patch only OR enable the two FakePCIID + FakePCIID Intel I-225V kexts.

 

[trs96]

That happened with my setup when it was set to only 8 cores, no e-cores, no HT and XMP was turned off.

Strange that anyone would do that when running the GB5 test in Windows 10. Maybe they were experimenting with macOS at the same time and had disabled e-cores and HT.

 

[Middleman]

Strange that anyone would do that when running the GB5 test in Windows 10. Maybe they were experimenting with macOS at the same time and had disabled e-cores and HT.

Yes for sure more than likely.

 

[tonben]

@AndyKramer, I will have it done when the guys get in tomorro

Would be great if you can run for us the Davinci resolve candle test on the m1 max and give us the results. Really would be great!

Here goes: M1 Max 16" 32gig/1TB (Base Model).
@AndyKramer, the provided link reveled a RocketScience_6K rather that the Candlelight test you referenced.

Results were +/- one point between Metal or OpenCL options.


MacBook M1 Max with 2 external UHD monitors


Apple ProRes 422 LT 25fps 6144 x 3456
9 Blur 30fps
18 Blur 15fps
30 Blur 9fps
66 Blur 5fps

1 TNR 46fps
2 TNR 22fps
4 TNR 11fps
6 TNR 8fps



Apple ProRes 422LT 25fps 3840x2160
9 Blur 30fps
18 Blur 16fps
30 Blur 10fps
66 Blur 5fps

1 TNR 48fps
2 TNR 23fps
4 TNR 12fps
6 TNR 8fps


H265 25fps 3840 x 2160
9 Blur 30fps
18 Blur 16fps
30 Blur 10fps
66 Blur 5fps

1 TNR 46fps
2 TNR 23fps
4 TNR 12fps
6 TNR 8fps

 

[wxz8506]

It depends which version of Big Sur you are using. If using Big Sur 11.4 or Monterey you remove all kexts and I-225V kernel patches because it is natively supported. Below that, you either enable Vit9696’s I-225V kernel patch only OR enable the two FakePCIID + FakePCIID Intel I-225V kexts.

I installed Big Sur version 11.2.1 and added pciroot network card information. The system reported that there was network card information in PCI, but the display driver was not loaded. Loading fakepciid + fakepciid Intel i-225v driver had no effect, and the information in Ethernet was still blank