- Joined
- Nov 27, 2012
- Messages
- 50
- Motherboard
- WS X299 SAGE/10G
- CPU
- i9-7960X
- Graphics
- Radeon VII
Dear members of the forum,
I use my computer exclusively for color grading, and as I'm planing to upgrade my system, I'm doing a little research on cooling both CPU and GPU. I know is a recurrent topic but I'd like to focus the question on video workstations.
To be more specific I'm aiming to a i9-7980XE or i9-9980XE (no OC) and dual Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB.
So my question is addressed basically to video editors or colorists or whoever uses his/her computer for long periods under heavy load:
Did you get better cooling performance using AIO water cooling in CPU and/or GPU?
or did you try AIO water cooling and got back to air cooling for some reason?
I've seen many test, unboxing, benchmarks, videos and read many posts in this forum about water vs air, but not sure if they are scenarios where intensive work during long periods. Reviewers' tests seems to review temperatures in a short period of time, not after 8+ hours of rendering and intense work, this guy explains how these tests may be wrong.
My case: I had some sudden reboots because using DaVinci my TitanX (air cooled) got over 95ºC, specially on summer.
Thanks in advance for your help and for this community.
I use my computer exclusively for color grading, and as I'm planing to upgrade my system, I'm doing a little research on cooling both CPU and GPU. I know is a recurrent topic but I'd like to focus the question on video workstations.
To be more specific I'm aiming to a i9-7980XE or i9-9980XE (no OC) and dual Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB.
So my question is addressed basically to video editors or colorists or whoever uses his/her computer for long periods under heavy load:
Did you get better cooling performance using AIO water cooling in CPU and/or GPU?
or did you try AIO water cooling and got back to air cooling for some reason?
I've seen many test, unboxing, benchmarks, videos and read many posts in this forum about water vs air, but not sure if they are scenarios where intensive work during long periods. Reviewers' tests seems to review temperatures in a short period of time, not after 8+ hours of rendering and intense work, this guy explains how these tests may be wrong.
My case: I had some sudden reboots because using DaVinci my TitanX (air cooled) got over 95ºC, specially on summer.
Thanks in advance for your help and for this community.