Contribute
Register

Whats your 2500K Geekbench Score?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mine won't do 5ghz easily either, but I haven't put much time into it. Here are my scores.

@Stock Clocks
37ghzstockbenchmarks9791geekcopy.png



@4.5ghz overclock
45ghzfulloverclock.png
 
MyG5 said:
I only have 32-bit results corresponding to different multiplier settings - is there a reliable "rule of thumb" way to convert those to 64-bit scores? Thanks.

GA-Z68MX-UD2H-B3
I5-2500K
Hyper 212 Plus
8GB Corsair XMS3 1600 (1.65V)

The system has been quite stable and usable at 4.6 - 4.7 GHz since this post. However could not boot at 4.8GHz (had not tried changing Vcore).
(1) From the graph, it looks like the gain is ~237(32-bit pts) per 0.1 GHz. Wondering what other fellow posters are getting. My guess is that my slope is not that great.
(2) Would appreciate some one could actually run a 32 bit vs 64 bit scoring comparison at different multiplier settings.

TIA
 
Geekbench 11925
i5 2500k @ 3.3 GHz, turboboost at 4.8 GHz for all 4 cores
Stock cooler
Auto CPU voltage

System is not fully stable like this. Will hit over 80 degrees and trip the overheat alarm within seconds running Prime95. But it can run long enough to do Geekbench.
-----------------

Geekbench 11316
i5 2500k @ 3.3 GHz, turboboost at 4.5 GHz for all 4 cores
Stock cooler
CPU voltage 1.265 V

System appears stable running Prime95 at this speed.
 
I've gotten 9400 at stock and 10400 when clocking to 4.0ghz. For some reason when I go to "About This Mac" it reads an incorrect CPU clock value. Is there a fix for this??

EDIT: Apparently everyone gets this.

Anyhow, has anyone compared their builds in Linux? I boot three OS's and my Linux OS has a superior geekbench score (comparing to the rest).

12000 in Arch Linux
10400 in Mac OS X 10.7.3
9800 Windows 7
 
12071 at 4,2GHz / 16 Go ram
 

Attachments

  • Capture d’e?cran 2012-05-23 a? 00.07.56.png
    Capture d’e?cran 2012-05-23 a? 00.07.56.png
    217.6 KB · Views: 230
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top