Contribute
Register

Apple Event announced for October 30th: 'Scary Fast'

Quite some time ago, Steve Jobs produced a computer which could host multiple mainboards (with integrated B&W display) and/or various extension boards, including an Intel-powered (non-x86!) colour display board. The first ever web server ran on one of these. It was not a Mac. But it was a Cube.
I went looking for history on this and it must be the NeXT, but I didn't find details about multi compute expansion.

Here is Jobs doing the intro to NeXT:

https://allaboutstevejobs.com/videos/keynotes/next_cube_introduction_1988

...we knew then that we wanted to put the computer in a one-foot cube.

IMG_5425.jpeg


In retrospect, it's an insightful and forward-looking presentation, notable for many observations, the most striking one being "the Mac will peak [in 1989] to be everything it's ever going to be"

From transcript:
Now, next comes the IBM PC. And although the clone phenomenon has extended the unit sales peak, our model says that the IBM PC peaked in around 1986, and I think the PC was everything it was ever going to be in 1986. Now, OS2 will probably constitute a new wave here. But as far as the MS-DOS PC, our model says it peaks in about '86.

Then came the Macintosh. Now our model says two things about the Macintosh.

The first one is, about a year ago, it crossed the PC in market momentum, not unit sales, but market momentum. Now, what does that mean? What it means is is that all of the new aggressive hot software is on the Macintosh first. It means the momentum of the market is behind the Mac.

But the model also says another thing. It says that Mac is going to peak next year. It says that you can already see cracks in the architectural foundation, which are going to keep it from being anything more than it will be sometime next year.

And this was true, the Mac's OS design could not handle the parallelism needed to keep I/O busy.

Jobs devotes a section of his presentation to the observation that mainframes treated the CPU as a scare resource with I/O processors staging data to it as needed.

The IBM PC was trapped behind programmed IO which required the CPU to move all device data.

Today an $50 NVMe drive has a built-in controller 100s of times more powerful than a NeXT.

It's funny to read the performance numbers he's bragging about:

5 MIPS CPU (The industry standard for 1 MIPS was the VAX 11/780 ). Your phone is 10,000 MIPS not counting the device support processors.

4 MB/s drive burst rate.

The challenge of 100Mb ethernet eating half the CPU.

Will printing every be figured out? He brags about retina display... of laser printer! 400dpi.

I didn't see anything about add-in mainboards.

We saw some new technology and we made a decision to risk our company, that we could pull it off and bring it to market about four years before anybody thought possible. And we've done it. The NeXT computer is the first computer in the world to ship with read-write erasable optical technology storage.

The lasting lessons from Jobs weren't in the techno0logy, they were about the harmonizing of the total system to a purpose that could be appreciated by non-computer people.

That's what I am always looking for with Apple's announcements.

[00:50:01]
So, uh, myself and Bud Tribble, and a few, the rest of us got on a plane, flew over to Europe and drove out to their studio. And they, they gave us sort of a lackluster presentation on their cube design, which was about a 10th as good as what we ended up with. Uh, and then they had the major unveiling where they were going to pull off the curtain and they, they gave us, designed a really fantastic buildup and it really was, every computer was going to look like this in five years and they pulled off the curtain. And it was a human - it was in the shape of a human head. From the neck up and the board's plugged in the back of the skull. So Hartmut rescued us and, uh, I think he's the best product designer in the world. And I'd just like to say, thank you Hartmut. I know you're out there today.
 
I didn't see anything about add-in mainboards.
The front of the Cube hold a backplane with four NuBus slots. The main board goes into one (your choice) as a daughter card rather than a mother board… The remaining slots can take the NeXT Dimension board (with its Intel i960 RISC CPU massively underused rendering Display PostScript in 32-bit colour) or some ultra-rare advanced audio-/video-cards. I suppose that most Cubes just went with the single main board and three empty slots.

And you could host multiple main boards in the enclosure. I've never seen this case, but from the specifications, it looks like it would be multiple computers in a single housing, each with its own peripherals.

The NeXT computer is the first computer in the world to ship with read-write erasable optical technology storage.
That one was the Cube's demise!
Magneto-optical is excellent for long-term storage but writing to it is rather slow. Display PostScript was a memory hog but the Cube was expensive so buyers went for minimal RAM—and then you do not, but really NOT, want to be on the receiving end of the experience of using a computer which has its swap memory on M/O. :banghead::banghead::banghead:

I guess we could say that Steve Jobs always had a bad habit of crippling his computers with respect to storage and then overcharging customers for a solution—and that this legacy is still very well alive at Apple.
Back in the days, though, it was simple enough to put a regular SCSI hard drive in the Cube.
 
Back in the days, though, it was simple enough to put a regular SCSI hard drive in the Cube.
You have always been able to add SCSI to a Mac. From the very beginning with third-party add-ons for the very first "Skinny" Mac to today with any PCIe card that supports macOS (maybe not the latest versions though).
 
The remaining slots can take the NeXT Dimension board (with its Intel i960 RISC CPU
My first job was VAX sydadmin for Intel P7 component engineering division. The P7 GDP (General Data Processor) was one of 4 components, which included a mainframe-style I/O channel processor, that was intended to revolutionize micro-computer systems with cache/core support for protection of SW objects, SMP, and fault-tolerance. The system was going to bring mini/mainframe power with advanced SW support a la Xerox PARC to industrial control (e.g., power stations, medical applications) and workstations. The system business that was spun-out to conquer these domains (BiiN) failed, but the GDP, stripped of its advanced system pretensions and targeted by a solid port of the GNU C compiler, became the i960 and the heart of laserprinters everywhere. The P7 wanted to be in a new workstation like the NeXT but it's application domain was defined by Siemens AG, was centered in Ada, and the design got lost a quagmire over what an microprocessor architecture should be. The P7 project had a sister component engineering project, called the 80386, which ended up being a somewhat better design cut. I left the P7 project near its culmination to do Sun sysadmin for an Intel/CMU supercomputer project lost in the annals of history called iWarp.

Regarding the Jobs NeXT presentation, so many details stand out as prescient:

• Jobs built on Englebart's Mother of All Demos for his patter.
• The seeds of the Cebtris Macs are apparent.
• His demos presage Pixar with the physics modeling.
• Little did he know that a scientist at CERN would take his interface builder demo to heart to create a little invention called the World Wide Web.
• Jobs presented his system as an inexpensive HW miracle loaded with free tools to enable a new cosmopolitan vehicle for education, math, science, and music. But what stands out today is the "licensing". He's working two sides of a street, appealing to the artist and the largesse of a commonwealth, but serving wall st. The JFK speech snippets and Apollo 11 are rife with the horrific cost of the Cold War on the world, and an expanding military industrial complex.
• He presented as simple a device which was going to make everything more complex.
• WRT storage, he doesn't speak about where all the data people are generating is going to live and who will own it.
• Touches like the GUI windows that can be moved offscreen counterpoint the "megapixel display". What's clear in retrospect is a lot is far from enough, and all he's imagined is the Finder, not what comes after it. Google is waiting in the wings.
• He introduces "the Dock". The interface builder is still alive in the form of right-clicking the Finder window toolbar and dragging its controls around. Everything else later became xcode for iOS.

I guess we could say that Steve Jobs always had a bad habit of crippling his computers with respect to storage and then overcharging customers for a solution

Reliable conventional wisdom, but my view is that even back at this demo, Jobs was keenly aware that the utility of data is in its movement between people, and the only story he had for this at that time was drives with cartridges and email. The internet was obvious enough as the future. What his audience couldn't see was that they were going to become colonized by their need to keep their data but lack of personal ownership of the means to share it. I think he was not able to grok this conundrum and the harsh reality of privatization may have created a rift in his ideals that hardened him as a man.

Lastly, the demo finished with Jobs pitting a human violin player against a computer. It's supposed to be a duo, but the pure mechanical strength of the computer and its overwhelming capacity to make noise leads to an apparent contest between the musician and the AI that 40 years later is threatening every artistic enterprise.

An entire generation of the "creative class" is now living in terror that they are going to be automated out of the economy, while there is no longer any society except the economy.

Do not look to Apple for guidance on these trends: it's their job to eat your lunch at every turn.
 
This photo of NeXT Cube better captures the tone of the looming Oct announcement. It's like Jobs is still influencing from the grave:

IMG_5422.jpeg


IMG_5426.png
 
Although we're likely to just see updates to (a) iMac 24", (b) 14" MacBook Pro, (c) 16" MacBook Pro and (d) maybe update or discontinuation of 13" MacBook Pro, I am interested to see what peripheral updates will accompany these new machines.
  • Wi-Fi 7
    • Not likely for Apple; why add to COGS (cost of goods sold) when there are practically zero Wi-Fi 7 client devices on the market
  • Thunderbolt 5
    • Too early
  • DisplayPort 2.0
    • No idea
  • Everything else is on Apple Silicon SoC
    • Maybe 2 additional P-cores?
    • More/faster GPU cores
    • Faster Neural engine
Will new iMac get M3? If TSMC's 3nm process is not producing high yields at this time, then M3 might not appear in a high volume product.

MacBook Pros are most likely to get M3.
 
I am interested to see what peripheral updates will accompany these new machines.
I would like to see Apple commit to a game controller for their, rather slow to get started gaming push. I’m kind of surprised they haven’t done much, since announcing No Mans Sky!, WRC would of been a good title, CodeMasters have built games for Apple before. Very disappointing imo, Apple just cant get serious about it!.
 
I would like to see Apple commit to a game controller for their, rather slow to get started gaming push. I’m kind of surprised they haven’t done much, since announcing No Mans Sky!, WRC would have been a good title, CodeMasters have built games for Apple before. Very disappointing imo, Apple just cant get serious about it!.
Alas I couldn’t care less about video games. :) I haven’t played such a game in 20 years or so. I do enjoy more productive games like Scrabble (good way to pass the time on long flights) and Chess.
 
Alas I couldn’t care less about video games. :) I haven’t played such a game in 20 years or so. I do enjoy more productive games like Scrabble (good way to pass the time on long flights) and Chess.
I need escapism!, keeps me sane. I’m also not very good at either chess or scrabble!.
 
I would like to see Apple commit to a game controller for their, rather slow to get started gaming push. I’m kind of surprised they haven’t done much, since announcing No Mans Sky!, WRC would of been a good title, CodeMasters have built games for Apple before. Very disappointing imo, Apple just cant get serious about it!.
I don't have any problems connecting an Xbox controller to my Mac over BT. Granted, the regular ones (vs the Elite versions) suffer from drift after a few years of use.
 
Back
Top