Although that's a today thing, it's not a tomorrow thing.Totally agree, this whole "The end of Hackintosh" is non sense. Seen that Logic 10.6 requires Catalina ?
I am excited to see a review somone using Logic X on a M1
OK we can make great benchmarks. But we dont buy computer for benchmarks .
Even not only for OS.
M1 macs will not have Adobe Apps. Its hard to imagine that Adobe rewrite/optimise
software for a few apple computers.
Probably lack no support for most serious apps. Thousands of apps will become
unavailable for new Macs.
Instead of this we can use IOS apps. So Adobe downgrade their M1 laptop/computer to
smartfon and add native apple software like FinalCutproX or Logic.
This is the end of mac computers . Most of the professional users will move to
Windows platform ( Of course not today or tomorrow but in a few years.
Apple have just produced a set of entry level machines that sell for about the same money as the Intel models, that they say are; multiple times faster, use less power and have good compatibility with current software now with better to come. Now it might be Apple bull, but the interviews with those who built these seem to show a bunch of people extremely happy with what they have achieved and confident they are on the right path.This is the end of mac computers .
In the previous video you posted it was very clear to me even though they did not out right say it. The reason why the M1 can get away with roughly half the memory that most people look for is that the pipeline is huge, so there is less need to que. Maybe I am understanding it wrong, but In my mind if you can push more data threw the tunnel then the line does not need to be as long.This Youtuber talks about why 8GB of ram in a new M1 Mac may not produce the equivalent performance of 8GB of ram in one the existing Intel Macs.
I think this is correct. You'll be able to do more with less ram. Big Sur will be a lot more efficient in it's use of ram. When using ram hogs like the chrome browser though, it may limit the number of tabs you could keep open. Google could care less about how much ram their browser consumes. I really doubt they'll do anything to optimize the Mac version to perform better with Big sur.In my mind if you can push more data threw the tunnel then the line does not need to be as long.