- Joined
- Aug 3, 2010
- Messages
- 1,105
- Motherboard
- Gigabyte Z68
- CPU
- i7-2660k
- Graphics
- GTX 560Ti
- Mac
- Classic Mac
- Mobile Phone
Implied said:Biggest nuisance about Apple is how they've changed.
In 2005 Jobs stood up at his Keynote, announced the move to Intel and said (looked it up just to get the exact wording): "We want to constantly be making the best computers for you, and the rest of our users." Around 1:20.
Now I don't know if they still stand by that, but honestly: The stuff we get is no longer "the best," in terms of speed, at least. USB 2.0, SATA II, no Blu-Ray even Build-To-Order Options, low-end SSDs which decrease in quality over time (so people report), non-modifiable computers with custom screws so that they're almost 100% tamper-proof. They're soldering stuff onto the Motherboard so we don't mess with it.
These days you can barely even upgrade the Hard Drive. OCZ gives you a whole toolkit just to replace the SSD on an MBA. Not everyone wants to pay Apple to replace the Hard Drive for them, they'd rather do it themselves. Custom Screws apart, its easy enough. Just flip off the case (the custom (patented) screws apart however, thankfully its a lot easier than it used to be. Plastic iMacs had it so hard to replace components....).
About 12 years ago, when someone said "Apple just released the fastest Notebook on the market" that was true. Apple had, literally the fastest Computers on the Market. No competition. 1999 Apple Laptops were the fastest back then. They were the first to adopt new Technologies. Floppies to CDs, USB, etc. Now Apple doesn't even have SATA III, USB 3.0, Blu-Ray, nothing. Not even as Build-To-Order options. If Apple had adopted these, they'd be default baselines on anything and everything by now. They'd be dirt-cheap.
The Screens are fantastic, yes. The new 27" Cinema Display is wow. Unique. Except: Glossy. The amount of times I hear people complaining about the Gloss.... And then there's the lack of ports. The 30" Aluminum had FireWire 400, USB 2.0. This one only has USB 2.0. The MBPs have a Non-Gloss option. iMacs don't however. Neither does the Cinema Display (on a side note, sad that they're down to only 1 Monitor option).
I understand Apple wants to hold off on USB 3.0 because Intel doesn't support it natively in it's Chipsets. I get this. But without even using SATA III, Apple can no longer say "we are making the best computers." Not in terms of speed. Sure, maybe in terms of stability. OS X is lightyears ahead of Windows 7. The hardware however, is going downhill.
Not to mention that Jobs's constant mania to constantly make everything thinner, thinner, thinner and thinner is a killer when it comes to cooling. No proper ventilation, reduced product life-span.
I like thin and light, I think we all do. But I don't like decreased life span due to enclosed ventilation spacing.
Sorry, QQ post over now.
There's no denying that Apple is still strong in creating revolutionary products. iPhone rocked the branches of the "Smartphone" market to the core. iPad created a whole new branch. Who knows what else will come from them in the next few years (although please no Touchscreen Desktops.. Least until the Fingerprint Smudges issue is resolved first) They'll probably start launching Liquidmetal products soon too, either this year or next year.
Still remember "The Cube".... Awesome machine. And the first iMac with a fan almost bigger than the monitor
Sad to see the apparent demise of the iPod Classic though. No SSD transaction, nothing so far
TL;DR:
If I can avoid it, never going back to a "real" Mac. Great design, but otherwise nothing interesting in them anymore.
The biggest problem I see with your post is that you are talking specifically about hardware, which is the same thing that so many techies get sucked into. It's not about hardware, and for Apple, it really never has been. At least, not when it comes to specs. They talk about them when they have to so that they can appease a small crowd of developers, for example, but they tend to try to avoid it. The reason is simple: they want people to evaluate the experience, not the numbers on a piece of paper. The quote you cited here was that they wanted to make the best computers (with the implication on the best experience), and I don't think they've let up on that.
Also, I'm not sure what the kick about modifying the computers is about, because Apple has always had this philosophy, even from the beginning. They used to design their enclosures so they couldn't be opened. It's nothing new, but that's the point. They want to build stuff that works for people, so that they don't need to modify them. I'm not saying this works for everyone, but if you're interested in Apple, you know it's always been this way.
About the display, I think it's funny, because I actually am frustrated that I can't find a quality 3rd party display that is glossy, like Apple's. To each their own.