Contribute
Register

Alienware 15R2 with MacOs Sierra 10.12.1

Status
Not open for further replies.
I never updated my bios , was already updated from the guy I got the laptop , but is the same bios used from my service tag , should I maybe flash this bios first ?

There are tools you can use to backup your current BIOS. Then you can do IFR extract from that...
 
There are tools you can use to backup your current BIOS. Then you can do IFR extract from that...
that would be smart , what tool should I be looking for ?
 
Also , using the tool directly on the .exe of the bios , should that have something to say ? Cause in guide is to extract it , and use a .fn file from it , but I have no such option to extract the .exe , forcing it to winrar says there is no archives in the file .
 
could you please check if can be extracted ? and how should I do it? here is the Bios .
 

Attachments

  • AW15A06.rar
    4.7 MB · Views: 87
Check resources on bios-mods.com.
Got some tools , extracted my bios , found out i actually have AMI bios .
Here is what i got .
Having Ami bios, would the command still work !?
Here an image with results i found .
 

Attachments

  • unnamed.jpg
    unnamed.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 156
Got some tools , extracted my bios , found out i actually have AMI bios .
Here is what i got .
Having Ami bios, would the command still work !?
Here an image with results i found .

You will find out when you do the IFR extract and attempt to set DVMT-prealloc with setup_var (or setup_var2) in the special UEFI shell.
 
what is the diffrence from var or var2? But would AMI bios accept such changes ?
Wondering what are the chances to mess it up .
 
what is the diffrence from var or var2?

No idea. But some have reported success with setup_var2 where setup_var failed.
I'm sure you could obtain the source code to that shell and analyze...

But would AMI bios accept such changes ?

I cannot predict the future.

Wondering what are the chances to mess it up .

Changing options not intended to be changed always a risk.
If you don't want to risk it, why not use the minStolenSize patch?
 
Changing options not intended to be changed always a risk.
If you don't want to risk it, why not use the minStolenSize patch?
What patch?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top