Contribute
Register

Giacomoleopardo's X79 "Mostro"

Status
Not open for further replies.
for PowerMangament used sandy bridge-e AppleIntelCpu patch for sierra from insanelymac.

And one more thing that i know, you can use intel vt-d , it not necessary to disable it . And it is very useful for virtual machines if you want boot 64 bit system
 

Attachments

  • 10.12 aicpm patch.command.zip
    1.3 KB · Views: 200
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok cool your single processor is higher now with 103 bclk then my 105 bclk score.
My multi score is still about the same because I have a bit more memory. 56GB ( 1 broken module :p )
Could you check if my processor naming was good in the second ssdt I send you as it seemed different from the first?
Now if Giacomoleopardo get's it working I would be very eager to know his scores with the 2687w's ;-)
Still working on getting Sierra working for me but I think that is GTX Maxwell related somehow...
 
Last edited:
leonardvv said:
Ok cool your single processor is higher now with 103 bclk then my 105 bclk score.
My multi score is still about the same because I have a bit more memory. 56GB ( 1 broken module :p )
Could you check if my processor naming was good in the second ssdt I send you as it seemed different from the first?
Now if Giacomoleopardo get's it working I would be very eager to know his scores with the 2687w's ;-)
Still working on getting Sierra working for me but I think that is GTX Maxwell related somehow...
Click to expand...
Everthing is ok on ssdt. Build on 2670 for 2680.
I got working nvidia 970 on sierra on x79 with single Xeon 2680 v1 (on my friend pc) but system starts only with iMac14,2 . With MacPro6,1 I was getting black screens, and any applegraphicspolicy patches didn't help. Maybe you can try boot with iMac smbios.
Also have a question , can you boot to OS X without graphics accelerator ( fakeid in clover or something like this).

Or maybe you can by used Radeon . For example 7970 is great for OS X cost about 120$ . And performance about the same as nvidia 960 -1050. I also tried Radeon 390x on our motherboard and have no problems. Radeon 460 not working because they need intel he graphics or helper card. And I don't have so , may be it will go with nvidia 210 + Radeon , but I not recommend it:)
 
Last edited:
I have a 7850 to try and a rx 460 but first I need my mac for work so no experimenting at the moment ;-)
 
leonardvv said:
I have a 7850 to try and a rx 460 but first I need my mac for work so no experimenting at the moment ;-)
Click to expand...
Rx460 will work only with helper card so you need to insert 7850 in 5 slot, and 460 in 7 slot. And I think you will get it:) please report me when you try:)
 
Hi Giacomoleopardo, you mention in your guide that you're using mXHCD.kext to get the ASM1042 USB3 ports working. I tried it and am also able to get those ports working on my P79X79-E WS board finally. However, it disables my Inateck USB 3 cards that I have installed. Are you able to use the mXHCD.kext with any other USB 3 chipsets or possibly know of a way to get the ASM1042 to play nice with other chipsets using the kext? Thanks!
 
byzyn4ik said:
Rx460 will work only with helper card so you need to insert 7850 in 5 slot, and 460 in 7 slot. And I think you will get it:) please report me when you try:)
Click to expand...

I was hoping the internal vga could function as the piggyback for the rx 460.
But I think I am gonna trade it for 1050ti fanless as it just got support added for osx.
Because I finally got Sierra running now thanks to your AICPM tip.
I even got it to work with all my kext and injection done from clover so it works with a completely vanilla install!!
So the aicpm is injected now.
Strangely it works for Sierra but in Capitan I still need AICPM modded in my real S/L/E.
I'll add my EFI so you can see how it works ;-)
Unfortunatly Sierra broke audio but I can fix that and my old aiport br4360 is not suppoted so I need something new for that.

Thanx man!
 

Attachments

  • Sierra EFI with AICPM injection.zip
    23.3 MB · Views: 239
@leonardvv Please attach your file to your post. Redirecting to a dubious link is not advisable for other Forum members.
 
Stork said:
@leonardvv Please attach your file to your post. Redirecting to a dubious link is not advisable for other Forum members.
Click to expand...

Hello Stork,

It was a wetransfer link so not very dubious source but the weird letter combo may look like a harmfull link.
I have added the file to the last post normally now...
I didn't try it before :p
Will do it like that in the future.
But please dont remove my wetransfer links from my other posts as they are genuinely there to help not harm.

Thanx,

Leonard
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Copyright © 2010 - 2024 tonymacx86 LLC
Back
Top