Thanks. Maybe I'll muster the energy before I go out to take a quick peek, as I'm sure that this will bug me all night and I'll be back at it in the morning.
Yeah, "fixed" those, but my question is, is t hat REALLY a fix or does it just work for what we have? i.e. had you tried my proposed fix as well?
68, 6074, Name already exists in scope (_SB_.PCI0.RP05.PEGP)
// start lenovo g50-70 patch
//
//
//
// FWBT, 64,
// SMDA, 256,
// BMN0, 72, *NOT USED*
// BDN0, 56, *NOT USED*
// B1RC, 16, BRC0 8, BRC1 8
// B1SN, 16, *NOT USED*
// B1FV, 16, BFV0 8, BFV1 8
// B1DV, 16, BDV0 8, BDV1 8
// B1DC, 16, BDC0 8, BDC1 8
// B1FC, 16, BFC0 8, BFC1 8
// B1CR, 16, *NOT USED*
// B1AC, 16, BAC0 8, BAC1 8
// B1CC, 16, *NOT USED*
// B1SM, 16, *NOT USED*
// B1C1, 16, *NOT USED*
// B1C2, 16, *NOT USED*
// B1C3, 16, *NOT USED*
// B1C4, 16, *NOT USED*
into device label H_EC code_regex B1RC,\s+16, replace_matched begin BRC0,8,BRC1,8, end;
into device label H_EC code_regex B1FV,\s+16, replace_matched begin BFV0,8,BFV1,8, end;
into device label H_EC code_regex B1DV,\s+16, replace_matched begin BDV0,8,BDV1,8, end;
into device label H_EC code_regex B1DC,\s+16, replace_matched begin BDC0,8,BDC1,8, end;
into device label H_EC code_regex B1FC,\s+16, replace_matched begin BFC0,8,BFC1,8, end;
into device label H_EC code_regex B1AC,\s+16, replace_matched begin BAC0,8,BAC1,8, end;
//
into method label B1B2 remove_entry;
into definitionblock code_regex . insert
begin
Method (B1B2, 2, NotSerialized) { Return(Or(Arg0, ShiftLeft(Arg1, 8))) }\n
end;
//
into method label GBTI code_regex \(B1RC, replaceall_matched begin (B1B2(BRC0,BRC1), end; OperationRegion (ERAM, EmbeddedControl, Zero, 0xFF)
Field (ERAM, ByteAcc, Lock, Preserve)
{
VCMD, 8,
...
SMDA, 256,
...
}
...
If (LEqual (And (Local0, One), Zero))
{
Store (FB4, SMDA)
}
...
If (LNotEqual (And (Local0, One), Zero))
{
Store (SMDA, FB4)
}
...I switched back to the desktop to send these, but I believe that I already did set DropOEM=true.
