[Release] Hackintool v3.x.x

[CaseySJ]

Thanks.

OK, so since mine (asus prime z370-a and z390-a) both use XHCI then I shouldn't need to rename it, right?.

I'm using USBinjectAll.kext from the current version of multibeast (11.0.1) I guess that's OK?

Yes and Yes! USBInjectAll was last updated in November 2018.

 

[asheenlevrai]

Tx

I still cannot figure out what's wrong with hs03 and hs04 and the USB3.1 Gen2 ports on my z370-a or with hs08 on my z390-a, then....

 

[asheenlevrai]

I frequently read that usbportlimit patches should only be used transiently but not for long term.
Why?
Is it because they are vulnerable to macOS updates ? Thus the need to find new patches for each new version of macOS?
Is it because tj^hey are causing any instability / bug / issue?

Tx
-a-

 

[Feartech]

I frequently read that usbportlimit patches should only be used transiently but not for long term.
Why?
Is it because they are vulnerable to macOS updates ? Thus the need to find new patches for each new version of macOS?
Is it because tj^hey are causing any instability / bug / issue?

Tx
-a-

can cause issues with your hack in the long run

 

[asheenlevrai]

can cause issues with your hack in the long run

tx
can you elaborate please?

 

[Feartech]

tx
can you elaborate please?

[Guide] Creating a Custom SSDT for USBInjectAll.kext

Overview One of the serious issues most users will face with 10.11.x (and later, including 10.12.x) is the new USB stack in OS X/macOS. It has a much heavier reliance on ACPI, and as a result is much more likely to expose bugs in your ACPI implementation of _PLD, and _UPC. It is covered in...

www.tonymacx86.com

 

[asheenlevrai]

[Guide] Creating a Custom SSDT for USBInjectAll.kext

Overview One of the serious issues most users will face with 10.11.x (and later, including 10.12.x) is the new USB stack in OS X/macOS. It has a much heavier reliance on ACPI, and as a result is much more likely to expose bugs in your ACPI implementation of _PLD, and _UPC. It is covered in...

www.tonymacx86.com

"In fact, the port limit patch is known to cause problems (it causes access outside a fixed array bounds). (...) Also, for each update, a new port limit patch may need to be created (as I write this, no working patch exists for 10.14.1, for example)."

I don't know what that means or what the consequences would be...

Other question. Would a custom SSDT allow to have more than 15 USB ports per controller?
I currently use the port injector codeless kext (hackintool) method, but I still cannot have more than 15 ports per controller apparently.

Best,
-a-

 

[Feartech]

"In fact, the port limit patch is known to cause problems (it causes access outside a fixed array bounds). (...) Also, for each update, a new port limit patch may need to be created (as I write this, no working patch exists for 10.14.1, for example)."

I don't know what that means or what the consequences would be...

Other question. Would a custom SSDT allow to have more than 15 USB ports per controller?
I currently use the port injector codeless kext (hackintool) method, but I still cannot have more than 15 ports per controller apparently.

Best,
-a-

no, you can't go over the 15port limit, hence the reason to create a ssdt or kext to make sure you are under the limit

 

[asheenlevrai]

no, you can't go over the 15port limit, hence the reason to create a ssdt or kext to make sure you are under the limit

Apparently this is not doable on my z390-a rig which has 11 physical USB ports and 19 logical (virtual?) USB ports...
So I guess I'm forced to give up on some of the ports, right?

 

[Feartech]

Apparently this is not doable on my z390-a rig which has 11 physical USB ports and 19 logical (virtual?) USB ports...
So I guess I'm forced to give up on some of the ports, right?

yes, you have to decide which ones you don't want to use