Contribute
Register

Post your GEEKBENCH scores!

Status
Not open for further replies.
ecoarena said:
"Have you achieved those speed with or without NullCPUPowermanagement.kext ?? I have the same component as yours and I am trying to find a way of getting rid of this kext which kills sleep on my system."

Hi eyeris10,

I am NOT using NullCPUmanagement.kext on either system - have never touched it (I have 2 separate drives installed). What kind of speeds are you getting? I've never bothered with overclocking as I feel my CPUs run a little warm. :oops:

Oh...and the machine sleeps and wakes with no problems and running 64 bit on both.

Regards

Eco

Thanks for your reply !

I have never used it before (NullCPUPowermanagement.kext) but I noticed that my system wasn't as fast as it was suppose to be. With no overclocking except the fact that I adjusted the memory to 1600mhz, I could only achieve a geekbench score of 5300 since I upgraded to Lion. (I had never done a geekbench test before so I got no proof that it might have been that way also on SL.

Somebody on this forum suggested that I add this kext because apparently bad power management could result in very low performance. I added it and miraculously the geekbench score went way up to a bit over 10 000 on 64bit. But as I said, sleep won't work anymore.

I am on a x58a-ud3r rev 2.0, i7 950 3.20, got 6gb of Corsair 1600mhz RAM and a XFX Radeon 5870 1gb DDR5 with Eyefinity. Everything was working perfectly except that it seemed slow for the power of the specs of this machine. That is why I tried to do the benchmark and got really disappointed with such a low score.

I would really be happy to find a solution that wouldn't involve to break sleep fonction on my system but still get better results than 5300... Maybe I should try to do a clean install of Lion... This is the only solution I can think of, but I would rather find something less time-consuming.

Thanks again
 
15971... I had 16,000+ but I clocked back down to 4.4 instead of 4.5 after two freezes during normal use..

I'm upset that I can't clock higher though =[
 
You really need to run some Prime95 Torture Test. There's no point to a high score if your PC can't pass those tests... that's like walking on a tightrope that any second could break/crash. Geekbenchmark score is not stressfull enough.
 
My torture regime consists of at least 12 hours of Prime95 large in-place ffts (max heat/power consumption), and at least 8 hours of memtest86. If you have no errors after all this, you can rest assured that you have a solid overclock. Oh and make sure your temps are within reasonable range.
 
11,101 on my stock system.

Board: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 Rev2
CPU: Intel i7-950 @ 3.07GHz
Graphics: Sapphire Radeon HD 5770
 
Just finished building my new system. Intel 3.5Ghz over clocked to 4.5GHz. ram at 1600 (no over clock)

Runs the Apple Cinema Display without Atlona as it has 2 x mini display ports. Also runs Win 7 at full resolution 2560 x 1440

GB Intel 2700K oc at 4.5Ghz.png
 

Attachments

  • GB Intel 2700K oc at 4.5Ghz.png
    GB Intel 2700K oc at 4.5Ghz.png
    96.4 KB · Views: 285
Very Nice!
passed prime95 test!

3.3 Ghz i7 980 (overclocked to 4.0 Ghz)
GA-X58A-UD3R (rev. 2.0)
24GB Kingston HyperX Blu DDR3 1333 (overclocked to 1600)
GeForce 9800 GT 1024 MB
Crucial M4 SSD 128GB


http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/537188



Screen Shot 2011-12-31 at 8.53.21 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2011-12-31 at 8.53.21 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2011-12-31 at 8.53.21 PM.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 238
I do not overclock, because my processor and board does not support, with low prices are still able to compete. with spec i3 2100,GA H67M-D2-B3,GTS 450 the score 7252
 

Attachments

  • wewewew.png
    wewewew.png
    65.6 KB · Views: 268
Hp ProBook 4530s
i3-2310m
HD 3000
4 Gb

Score: 5117
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2012-01-02 at 10.40.46 PM.png
    Screen shot 2012-01-02 at 10.40.46 PM.png
    103.2 KB · Views: 284
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top