Post OS X Luxmark OpenCL Benchmarks

[Gigamaxx]

Use Luxmak v3.1

There's a huge difference between them.

 

[crazyeye941]

Use Luxmak v3.1

I'll try it out when I get home from work around 12 tonight (hopefully :S)

What is the difference between what I have? Is it just the specific test used in between versions?

 

[s_keo]

Is this any good for a luxmark result?

 

[Gigamaxx]

Very good, right where they should be. Go to the top menu bar when opening Luxmark and hit mode then select all CPUs and GPUs, it will add your Intel graphics as well and bump you up about 1000-1800 points.

 

[TheTuner]

 

[shasen1235]

Slightly behind 1070 I say!

Also I'm a bit confused...my 980ti is a golden picked card and runs a bit higher than reference and mid-range 3rd party cards.
But all of the 980ti I've seen on Hackintosh run at 1190Mhz.
Is it just margin of error or macOS is reading the wrong number? Curious...

Anyway, [email protected]+980ti

 

[cdrhoek]

Fury X using latest Whatevergreen.kext

 

[sxpal]

High Sierra 10.13 - i7 7700K - x2 PowerColor r9 280x - 32 GB DDR4 2133 mhz. - 500 GB Samsung Evo 960 NVME.
Results Luxmark 3.1 - Luxball - 25626

 

[Saminn]

macOS High Sierra VEGA 56 with VEGA 64 Bios flashed.

 

[pastrychef]

macOS 10.13 High Sierra
LuxMark 3.1
i7-7700K @ 5.1GHz
Gigabyte GTX 1080