- Joined
- Sep 9, 2014
- Messages
- 6
- Mac
- Classic Mac
- Mobile Phone
Hi guys,
I was hoping to get some clarifications in regards to PCIe slots, lanes and speed.
I'm building a workstation and I need enough lanes/slots to accommodate a dual GPU config, raid card and others. That's why I have selected the parts around Socket 2011.
But I'm reading here and there on forums that 1150 is more than enough unless you need to go above 3 GPUs, etc. ?
What do you think about this?
Also if I understand correctly, entry level sockets like 1150 have a very different PCIe lanes architecture that doesn't really allow them to use multi x16 cards configurations. Is that correct? For dual GPU at best we're at x8 + x8?
Unless there's a 1150 board that has a lot more than 24 lanes out there? (But it's a CPU limitation also right?)
Thanks!
I was hoping to get some clarifications in regards to PCIe slots, lanes and speed.
I'm building a workstation and I need enough lanes/slots to accommodate a dual GPU config, raid card and others. That's why I have selected the parts around Socket 2011.
But I'm reading here and there on forums that 1150 is more than enough unless you need to go above 3 GPUs, etc. ?
e.g. "Yep in a single or dual GPU configuration there is no reason whatsoever to go with a 2011 socket"
or "There is NO reason to go for 2011 UNLESS you have a use for more PCI-e lanes, which I can not see happening since 1150 already can do tri GPU cards with no effort."
Also "go with 1150. even with 3-4 GPUs it's already been shown that 8x vs 16x in multi card configs doesn't make much of a difference if any at all."
What do you think about this?
Also if I understand correctly, entry level sockets like 1150 have a very different PCIe lanes architecture that doesn't really allow them to use multi x16 cards configurations. Is that correct? For dual GPU at best we're at x8 + x8?
Unless there's a 1150 board that has a lot more than 24 lanes out there? (But it's a CPU limitation also right?)
Thanks!