I also asked few questions directly to DBP by PM (because I needed very fast replies), and here is our full discussion.
I'd like to thank again DBP and each of you for your great help.
Fell free to share your point of view !
Hi DBP !
I think I almost chose my motherboard. If you permit me, here is my conclusions...
At first I wanted to take the Rampage because it seems designed for OC,
and had more space between the PCI slot, and I thought it can be better for the air cooling of all my cards.
But, after research and few question to RED and Blackmagic, they told me they think it won't change anything for their card.
And I also see that the Rampage is really useful only for high OC, so, not really my goal.
I follow your suggestion, and try to find the best between others ASUS motherboard.
The Sabertooth seems nice but has not enough PCI slot for my 4 card, so I went to the P9X79 line.
The WS seems more oriented for workstation, and I don't really see what it can give me more than a PRO or Deluxe.
Now, I had to chose between those PRO and Deluxe, and the only difference I saw are few more USB, 2x ethernet, bluetooth 3.0, and...
8 more phases for the overclocking !!
I read thousand (really, I swear !!) post about the 8 vs. 16 phases, and lots of people said it's not important except for
world record overclocking, but few others says it always better to have more phase to increase stability !!
So...... I'm fed-up and lost.......
You know what I want.... just an OC to 4,5GHz (the max I can get with NH-D14) and.... the more stable possible !! ; D
So......... what will be the best, 8 or 16 phase ? Or no difference at all for such a "small" OC ???
DBP said:
Personally I wouldn't be fussed about the phases.
Don't go into it thinking "I will only be able to achieve <this> speed [with an NH-D14]", or even "I will be able to achieve at least <that> speed". There are so many variables (including the specific chip you end up with). See how far you can push it. In the end the improvements for each additional 100 MHz are fairly insignificant.
BTW I've seen reports of an i7-3930k running stable with an NH-D14 at 4.7 GHz.
I made a scheme for my PCI card, and if you just can confirm me everything will be right about PCI speed...
PCI card
- blue PCI x16 - GTX680 4Gb (PCI x16)
- white PCI x8 - RED Rocket (PCI x8)
- white PCI x8 - BMC Declink (PCI x4)
- blue PCI x16 - RAID controller card (PCI x4)
DBP said:
Which DeckLink are you planning to get? There are x1 and x4 versions.
The Extreme 4K in PCI x4... but I'll maybe wait the release of the next Blackmagic cards with XYZ colorspace.
But, maybe those card will be in PCI x8... I'm not sure if it's possible.
And it's the same question the next RED Rocket, is it possible that those cards can be in x16 ??!
RED and Blackmagic didn't gave me real answers about that, so... just have to wait.
DBP said:
Unfortunately ASUS doesn't publish architecture diagrams like Gigabyte do that show us how the PCIe slots are allocated lanes. Some of the x16 slots on these boards have to share bandwidth, but it seems on the PRO like you have the option of:
two independent x1 slots (slots 2 and 6)
one independent x8 slot (slot 4 - put the Red Rocket here?)
one x16 slot (slot 1 - put the GTX 680 here?)
two x8 slots (slots 3 and 5 - put the DeckLink and RAID controller here?)
I suspect the DELUXE is the same.
Yep, I found the same specs..... 1x PCI x16 and 3x PCI x8 for my 4 PCI cards.
And about the storage, I also made a scheme to have a better idea about RAID and speed.
Storage
Intel X79 chipset
- Smoke 2013 projects folder - 1x SATA 6Gb/s - 1x Barracuda 3Tb
- CS6 projects folder - 1x SATA 6Gb/s - 1x Barracuda 3Tb
- 30 hours of R3D footage - 2x SATA 3Gb/s - RAID 0 - 2x Barracuda 3Tb
- 30 hours of R3D footage - 2x SATA 3Gb/s - RAID 0 - 2x Barracuda 3Tb
Marvell 9128 chipset
(if I understood, it's 500Mb/s bandwith max divided between 2 drives)
Boot OS / apps - 1x SATA 6Gb/s - 1x SSD 128Gb
Scratch disk for CS6 - 1x SATA 6Gb/s - 1x SSD 128Gb
External backup
- DROBO 5D - 5x 4Tb Deskstar = 14,5Tb available in special DROBO RAID 5 (72 hours of R3D footage)
- 2x USB3 drive for projects files
DBP said:
Fine. But it's not going to matter which port these drives are plugged into. They top out around 200 MB/s (2 Gb/s) each.
WTF ???!!!! 2Gb/s each ?????! So what's the point to buy fast SSD ????!
DBP said:
I was referring to the HDDs topping out around 2 Gb/s and thus being fine with SATA-II ports. SSDs should of course by preference go to SATA-III ports, although for some uses a compromise down to 3 Gb/s can be OK for SSDs.
After calculation, it appears that with a 20Gb OS + 15Gb CS6 + 3Gb Smoke + other apps,
my apps disk will just need 60 to 70Gb maximum. so do you think I will need more than a 128Gb SSD ?
The video temp folder will be on another 128Gb SSD scratch disk, but about the apps drive is there a risk
that the OS swap file or other hidden files from the CS6 apps filled it until it....explode !!! ; D
DBP said:
Regarding the boot disk, I have two builds which each have ~40-45 GB used on the boot drive. One is 128 GB, one is 240 GB. If you needed 80 GB of swap space (128-45) then you've probably got a bigger problem. But the OS creates temp and log files on there too, so Bad Things happen if it fills up. I'd be tempted to get a 240 or 256 GB so you don't have to worry about it.
80Gb of swap files ? For the OS ??? Because I thought if I use a scratch disk,
I'll need only 10/20Gb of swap files for OS and apps... at worse !!
In this case I can take a 256Gb SSD to have more room.... but... if not, it's just 200Gb wasted !
DBP said:
Exactly, if you needed 80 GB of swap your machine would be very sick. Even if you had 64 GB RAM.
It should be less, but you want to have spare so that if that big project has been running for 5 hours already and is chewing up more and more memory, you'd prefer that it was able to eventually finish rather than crash when the swap space ran out.
For "desktop" systems I've config'ed, I find 120/128 GB boot drives are more than enough, although I do need to be careful to not fill up my home folder with too much junk. I've set up things like ~/Documents to be links to other storage drives on the system. But a bit more "safety buffer" on the boot drive is cheap insurance I suppose.
Get over the fact that drive space is empty. That doesn't mean it's wasted. It's good to have free space!
About scratch disk, is 128Gb enough with CS6 ?
DBP said:
Which CS6?
I'm an expert in Photoshop CS6 and use InDesign CS5, but I'm not familiar with the needs of Premiere Pro CS6 or After Effects CS6.
Is the Marvell chipset fully supported on Hackintosh ?
I'm absolutely not sure if it will work, but....
I saw this thread... so I'll try to stay confident !!
DBP said:
I'm not sure the Marvell 9128 is supported. It's not mentioned in the documentation for the "3rd Party [e]SATA" kexts in MultiBeast. Look for any reports of people using these boards with OS X to check their experiences.
However both those P9X79 boards also have an ASM1061 controller which definitely is supported, connected to two rear eSATA ports. You can always run cables from those back inside the case to SATA drives if you needed.
So.... P9X79 PRO or Deluxe ? Or another suggestion ???
Please tell me what will be your choice (except a supermicro mobo with dual XEON !!) ???
DBP said:
Another possible board is the Gigabyte GA-X79-UD7, which will give:
x16 GTX 680 in slot PCIEX16_1
x8 Red Rocket in slot PCIEX16_2
x4 Decklink in slot PCIEX8_1
x4 RAID in slot PCIEX8_2
three other independent x1 slots
gigabit LAN, four USB3 ports, fourteen (!) USB2 ports
two Marvell controllers which are supported: four 6 Gb/s SATA
four 3 Gb/s and two 6 Gb/s SATA (on X79 chip)
Had you discounted this board for some other reason? I've been talking to so many people about different boards recently I may have lost track. I suspect there are a few OS X builds using this board.
Well, it's because I have a better price with a web shop, and despite they have lots of motherboards, ther is no Rampage or GA-X79-UD7.
So, after reading few reviews, I thought take the P9X79 line, and I really hope the PRO will be a good board for OSX...
About the RAM with a 3930K, do I need to use quad channel for my 64Gb ,
or 8 stick of dual channel will do exactly the same, like you said about the i7-3770K ?
DBP said:
You want to run the memory in quad-channel mode. To do this you need memory of the same timing/size/etc in that group of four.
When you buy a double-channel pair the manufacturer is guaranteeing to you that the sticks are exactly the same. Usually from the same batch out of the factory.
When you buy a quad-channel pack you're getting a similar guarantee. You can get two pairs and use them, you're just not getting that guarantee.
Okkkkkkk....... I'm sorry, I didn't knew..... I thought quad-channel was a special internal technology, like XMP !!
So, it's logical, I need 2x4 identical stick of RAM... so I need to buy 2x32Gb pack of RAM... right ??
DBP said:
And what do you think of this RAM ?
It's quad channel, seems enough low profile for NH-D14,
and with 14900/1866 and CL9/10/9/28, it can be good about speed...
but I'm little confused about CL9, and this CL9/10/9/28 !! I'd better take a "full" CL9 ?
DBP said:
That Ripjaws-X quad-pack looks good. I don't think you'd notice any difference between 9-9-9-28 and 9-10-9-28: it sounds fine.
Sorry, to ak again about that, but, again, I'm very lost.... the PSU !!
Lots of people advise me to take a Corsair AX, rather than "simple" HX. Because apparently there is less "fluctuations"... ok.
But I absolutely don't understand what I have to take as voltage !!
I read again the thing you wrote about the problem to have a too big PSU, and
made lots of test on this web calculator,
and at maximum it says I'll need 750W... but friend around me says if I use the CPU overclocked and GPU at max,
with all drives at full load, etc (even if we know it's impossible), I better take a 1200W directly !!!
I was confident in the eXtreme PSU calculator web site, which told me the max watt needed at full load is 718W,
so in theory, I can't go more than a 850W PSU !! (and it was excessive futurproof tests, with 10x high perf fans,
3x more PCI x8 and 2x eSATA external drive more, with the 6x internal SATA drives + 2x SSD + many USB devices !!)
I don't know if I'm clear... but the problem is surely I asked to the wrong friends, but if you can confirm me that
if this site said I'll just need 768W at max, YES I just need to take a 850W PSU, but absolutely no more !!!
(On this test I checked : highend desktop / 3930K / OC to 4,6GHz at 1,4V / 8 stick RAM DDR3 / GTX680 / 8x regular SATA (6x SATA + 2x eSATA) /
2x flash SSD / 3x PCIx8 / 4x USB devices / 9x 120mm high perf fans / 1x 140mm high perf fan)
DBP said:
Going for 850W in that case sounds good. Most of those calculators are actually made by companies in the business of selling PSUs, so they're not going to UNDERestimate.
Subsidiary question.... what do you think about the Corsair C70 ? I mean did you hear rally bad things about it ?
I like it because it seems resistant and not really huge, and if one day I'll use my computer on stage,
it's maybe useful... but, of course, the most important will be the temperatures, and the noise, so, if it's too bad...
DBP said:
I don't know. Certainly looks like a rugged transportable case.
I haven't seen one in person.
Thanks a lot !!