Contribute
Register

Gigabyte Z690 Aero G + i5-12600K + AMD RX 6800 XT

Reason 2:
  • Our desktop systems are composed of:
    • Separate tower for computer
    • Separate monitor
    • In other words, our Hackintosh systems are not all-in-one units
  • Mac Pro is the only current Intel-based system from Apple that comes in two pieces
    • (Mac Studio is not Intel-based)
    • In About this Mac we therefore see an image of a mini-tower

Reason 2 drifted into magical thinking.

At risk of sounding pedantic...

The SW doesn't know anything about our regards the physical placement of components in space (towers vs AIO). SW function is determined by the types of components and the connections and logic bringing them together.

The only rule that I can think of about AIO macs is that they tend to rely on Intel iGPU.

As to reasoning about length of support by Apple: This is a red herring. The whole point of hackintosh is end-running what is supported by Apple! We proceed by examining what can made to work. It just so happens that for 20 years Apple based products on Intel PC and strongly influenced PC design. If someone figured out you could boot from a pile of sand, they'd use it, regardless as to whether a pile of sand was ever supported by Apple. We persist because for a long time the essence of Mac was just the SW orchestration of a PC.

There's no principle that I can determine about SMBIOS selection other that matching a config to a pile of sand in a way that works for you.

As to SMBIOS and incremental Software Updates, I can't argue about what's been found to work-or-not-work witb some pile of sand. But that also reads like ju-ju.

It's not my intention to deride here. I prefer reasons with explanations to reasons of pure lore. I'm speaking up to call out pure lore and to steer the life-raft I'm sharing away from Cargo Cult Falls and the legend El Dorado located at the bottom of the falls.
 
Reason 2 drifted into magical thinking.

At risk of sounding pedantic...

The SW doesn't know anything about our regards the physical placement of components in space (towers vs AIO). SW function is determined by the types of components and the connections and logic bringing them together.

The only rule that I can think of about AIO macs is that they tend to rely on Intel iGPU.
Reason 2 is about a cosmetic best fit. You're making a mountain out of a mole hill.

As to reasoning about length of support by Apple: This is a red herring. The whole point of hackintosh is end-running what is supported by Apple! We proceed by examining what can made to work. It just so happens that for 20 years Apple based products on Intel PC and strongly influenced PC design. If someone figured out you could boot from a pile of sand, they'd use it, regardless as to whether a pile of sand was ever supported by Apple. We persist because for a long time the essence of Mac was just the SW orchestration of a PC.
Apple may retire both iMacPro1,1 and MacPro7,1 at the same time -- or they may retire iMacPro1,1 before MacPro7,1. There is no scenario in which the MacPro7,1 is retired before iMacPro1,1.

So why bet on anything other than MacPro7,1?
 
Apparently I225V problems are rampant even on the Windows side due to buggy versions (from my readings, I225V rev 1 and 2 seem to be most problematic). I wonder if the GB Aero G has a different I225V version than the ASUS mobos.
i225 has also proved to be problematic for Linux and FreeBSD-based servers.
 
Which version of BIOS are you trying to install? There's a note at the top of Post 1 stating that BIOS F20 and F21 should not be installed.
Gigabyte replied
I got from Gigabyte BIOS F22 for Z690 Gaming X DDR4 in which they restored support for Titan Ridge. As I said earlier, you have to push them and write about our problems.
 
Gigabyte replied
I got from Gigabyte BIOS F22 for Z690 Gaming X DDR4 in which they restored support for Titan Ridge. As I said earlier, you have to push them and write about our problems.
Great effort!!

F22 is available now on the website. It has an internal build date of 07-Dec for Aero G and 14-Dec for Gaming X DDR4.

For Z690 Gaming X DDR5 there is F23a dated 04-Jan.
 
Great effort!!

F22 is available now on the website. It has an internal build date of 07-Dec.
Does anyone know if they fixed Titan Ridge support on F22 for Aero G DDR4 like they did for Gaming X DDR4?
 
Great effort!!

F22 is available now on the website. It has an internal build date of 07-Dec for Aero G and 14-Dec for Gaming X DDR4.

For Z690 Gaming X DDR5 there is F23a dated 04-Jan.
My customized BIOS F22 dated 05-jan-2023
230109210551p-png.561533
 
** General Interest Post **

Some folks on other forums are reporting multi-core performance improvement on Intel 12th and 13th gen CPUs when using both:
  • ProvideCurrentCpuInfo kernel quirk (we have this checked on already)
  • CpuTopologyRebuild.kext (click here for details)
Is there any benefit to use this kext after all ? I tried it for a while for every day use but I didn’t notice any difference. What would you suggest ?
 
Does F22 correct the issue with the second sleep ? For my board the f22 bios on their site is still from 14-12-22
 
My customized BIOS F22 dated 05-jan-2023
230109210551p-png.561533
Ah, so we need to wait a bit longer. Are you allowed to share the new BIOS?
 
Back
Top