@CaseySJ
Just to chime into the discussion:
Another thing to keep in mind too with hackintoshes is that we get to bypass any Apple firmware updates that are part of the OS upgrade process. As we have no Apple firmware to update.
But real macs don’t have this luxury. With Big Sur -> Monterey, there were firmware updates that failed on some real macs and bricked them. A really terrible experience. Worse than malware when you think about it, because no one expects an OS update to corrupt their firmware and brick their machine.
Also, our hackintoshes by definition can run multiple OSes and can be repurposed into multiple use cases. For those of us that are gamers, we can game in windows on some days. Use macOS on most other days. Dabble in Linux on some days too. You can sort of do this on Apple Silicon, but only in a VM, not natively yet.
As long as Intel continues the IPC increases and delivers its products on time, long x86 shall live despite the impending ARM invasion.
Apple prides itself on performance per watt, but with how expensive the latest m1 pro/ m1 max MacBook pros are with their level of performance, it seems that Intel is winning the performance per dollar side of the equation. Apple Silicon Mac Pros are very likely to be very expensive.
So what do you prefer performance per watt or performance per dollar? Tradeoffs. And so we have to make up our own mind as to which tool to use for the job. I must say my apple silicon m1 max MacBook Pro is the best laptop I’ve ever owned. No complaints at all. It will last several years.
But on the desktop side, I prefer a hackintosh to any desktop machine that apple manufactures. And given that open core has been updated to make all P + E cores + hyper threads available to macOS, hackintosh will continue to flourish as Raptor Lake comes with even more E cores. Long live hackintosh. Glad Intel is coming back.