Hello Casey, just a personal battle I have here, as I find a lot of people having new systems with Intel K CPUs that are throttling because of CPU or VRM temperatures (when they go liquid they often forget to cool down VRMs area) you could maybe add a suggestion about skipping the K and go with the plain 10900?
As I stated before, these are the power/performance tests I carried out using Cinebench r15 on Windows with no undervolt
10900 engineering sample: 110w, 2240 points
10900 standard : 190w, 2460 points
10900k : 320w, 2650 points
The scores on macos are usually a couple percent points slower.
These are all on Vision D builds. The es can go with a 120mm cooler, the standard needs a 140mm, the K ... I can't imagine anyone running that thing for continuous workload, and the system will throttle it down to 180w after 28seconds thus providing same performance as the stock model.
Even though the 10900 is rated at 65w, z490 boards will set it unlimited anyway, so it will always run 4,4ghz all core and ther's where it takes around 190w .
The integrated cooler in the 10900 is useless, but it's nice to have a spare.