Search results

Before I had 3x R9 270X 4Gb and they finished the test in 21/22 sec

26 sec. with 1x R9 270X 4Gb The result obtained in the past was surely the result of an error, this is a more reliable result. FCPX certainly did not erase all the files rendered, maybe it was a bug, I do not know, but it was impossible to believe that with one R9 270X ended the test in 19...

Finally everything normal! I replaced the library HDD with an SSD and values returned to normal. BruceX Test in 26 sec. average For some 'time there we really believed that he could take the test in less than 20 sec.:lol:

I have done a clean install on a new SSD. I installed only FCPX to do the tests .. Amazing, same results. This time there were no file cache pre-rendered .. I tried to change from SMBIOS MacPro5,1 to MacPro3,1, and change the position of the Library and the cache of FCPX but continues to run the...

I also manually deleted the cache files .. I am continuing to do tests but still I do not find errors. I also downloaded the file again XML Tomorrow I try to do a clean install on another ssd

Ok guys, I've done all the tests that I could, I could not find anything strange or wrong in my system. To not think that is cheating or it is a fake, you step the video link complete test. https://youtu.be/ggNH_YjWnEI I'm available for questions and any test .. I also would like to...

Which version of FCPX have installed? I have the 10.2.2 :banghead:

in this configuration I have 1 in the previous configuration on a motherboard EVGA X58 SLI I had 3 and I was 22 seconds

Ok, after deleting cache files I've followed all the instructions: imported a new XML file disabled pre-rendering background exported in ProRes 422 exiting and restarting the procedure 5 times the result varies from 18.90 to 20.20 seconds I would remind you that I have always performed...

I want to clarify that I am very surprised and incredulous I too, would like to know why this happens. To delete files pre-rendered simply delete the cache of FCPX?

I disabled the background rendering and I closed and reopened three times FCPX Count the seconds: https://youtu.be/4dqzhc-pkJY I'm speechless and I do not understand why ..:roll:

Ok , first of all I apologize for my terrible English .. I was very surprised I even from the result of this test. Before this I had a X58 + i7 [email protected] Ghz + 3x Asus R9 270X and I performed the test with a result of about 22 seconds, Luxmark was about 4950 .. Now, this system achieves a score of...

i3 3220 SSD Samsung 840 evo 8GB G.Skill 1600 Asus R9 270X 4GB El Capitan 10.11.1 FCPX 10.2.2 19,22 sec :wtf:

Well! I'm happy to be helpful! :thumbup: Is it possible

I'm not sure that the problem of the background is connected to my solution but you can try The problem occurs when the primary monitor is not connected to the main output of the video card. I solved it by going to preferences, display preferences and the menu position (in Italian is...

I think I've solved the problem of desk spaces .. The problem occurs when the primary monitor is not connected to the main output of the video card. I solved it by going to preferences, display preferences and the menu position (in Italian is "Disposizione" in English I do not know) I...

Yosemite 10.10.1 FCPX 10.1.3 1) EVGA X58 i7 [email protected] + 24Gb DDR3 1600 + 3x R9 270X 4Gb = 19,86 2) P8H61-M LX2 + i3 [email protected] + 8Gb DDR 3 1600 + 1x GTX 280 1Gb = 88,71

Post OS X Yosemite Luxmark OpenCL Benchmarks Hello everyone, in the transition from the Mavericks in Yosemite my score has improved quite a lot going from 4580 to 4910! I'm very happy about that! :thumbup:

Hi, this is my results with 3x Asus R9 270x FCPX works very fine :thumbup: P.S.- Sorry for my english..:P

Hello everyone! First of all I apologize for the bad English but I'm Italian and I asked for help to my friend Google Translate.. I just installed a new Asus DirectCU II R9270X 4GB on my X58 system with dual monitors Philips 27" 1920 x 1080 - 60Hz and guess what !? It works out of box...