Recent content by ronalith

@malki if your thunderbolt isn't working try updating the firmware. Download it from Gigabyte's site.

Hi All! Just wondering if there's any 10.13 patches available? Are the 10.12 patches still working for High Sierra?

My systems are not stable when Overclocking memory, do you know how to properly inject memory info? To be fair, they only crash on very specific situations but one way to trigger it is to encode something with handbrake.

Currently running Sierra 10.12.3 Change Bios settings to 4.3 GHz (if possible test stability on another OS) Check my attached config for Kernel patches, all of them are needed. Important: Haswell-E CPUID Patch has to match your processor. Info here. Generate proper SSDT. I used: ./ssdtPRGen.sh...

It works! I've been "restarting" for days now and it always picked it up as 2.0. I did a full unplug today and the second row is picked as SSP5. By now I consider my method 100% good. I'll upload an SSDT soon.

Unfortunately, the second row on the back of the board is detected for me as USB 2.0 only, though the other ports are all fine and the system is stable. I'm still working on a final SSDT-UIAC that I hope to share soon. If anyone can confirm their status on that row with this method that'd be great.

try fn+f4 if you have fn key

check EFI/CLOVER/ACPI/origin/ files should be there after pressing f4 at boot without any notification.

Thanks, attached again. (Re attached everything, there was missing ACPI info)

I've been unsuccessfully trying to create an SSDT for a GA-X99P-UD4 (device id 318d). All devices attached on HS09/PR11 are identified always as USB 2.0, I think that is because the internal hub (Renesas 045b) is always identified as 2.0 as well though it seems to be connected on the USB 3.0...

My USB settings after lots of struggle: For further info check the actual USB fixing guides, I know nothing and I didn't inject a USB SSDT so things at this point can still be wrong. Rename EHC1, EHC2 and XHC on DSDT as per guide info (I use DSDT) Kexts needed: FakePCIID_XHCIMux.kext –...

Best performance multi-core (on benchmarks) so far for me is disabling xcpm. :(

Good question, seems that single core stays closer to the actual values without xcpm. Multi I'd say.

So, why is it that enabling xcpm results in lower benchmarks/performance? I'm getting 15k vs 20k geekbench 4 on an i7-6800k @ 4.2 GHz

Guide: Asus X79 OS X Controlled SpeedStep Is your sleep working fine? after updating my sleep stopped working. I have a Xeon E5-2665 so I use AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementSandE.kext, I also don't own an Asus board but this method finally fixed my energy stuff after patching the bios. The kext...