- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 801
- Motherboard
- GA-Z390-Aorus Pro
- CPU
- i7-9700K
- Graphics
- RX 590
I have been eagerly following this thread but having looked at the benchmarks of the Intel i3 3225 against the i3 3217U, my enthusiasm has, unreasonably, dipped. Comparing a desktop CPU against a CPU designed for low powered ultrabooks is, I appreciate, daft and the i3 3217U with HD4000 is more than adequate for surfing and home cinema, but the benchmarks perhaps make shelling out the extra for an i5 Mac Mini, or going the i3 3225/Gigabyte Z77n-ITX or Asrock Z77e-ITX route, seem more appealing for a productivity environment in a still small form factor. I remain very interested in following this and seeing where Intel take the price and spec.
you're right to not try to compare the performance of the NUC to a big desktop with a fast proc and a fancy GPU. my daughter's high school lacrosse coach always told the girls: "you can have it all, just not at the same time".
for a box not much bigger than an apple TV, that you can pick up for $300, it's great for a home theater PC, an "internet machine", or maybe a file server for your home network, or other not too compute-intensive tasks.
i am using mine as an HTPC. i bought the thunderbolt version, and sprung for a seagate goflex thunderbolt adapter, and a 2TB sata 3 HD for media storage. to keep other costs down, i'm running from a 32gB USB stick, with my home folder relocated to my HD. sure, an SSD would be lightning fast to boot and open apps, that's not important to me in this use. i only have a single 4GB stick of 1333mhz memory (8 gb 1600 is in the mail). the 32-bit version of geekbench measures the machine at about 4000.