- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Messages
- 740
- Motherboard
- Z97X-UD5H
- CPU
- i7-4790K
- Graphics
- 2 x R9 280X
- Mac
Hi,
I've just upgraded my iMac to Yosemite. The iMac is the least most important Mac in the house and acts as a test rig, if it all goes pear shaped, nothing lost, so we upgrade the iMac first to check things out and see if Apple has gone mad anywhere.
So we upgraded to Yosemite, zero problems. Can't say I like the new colour scheme or the flat 2D icons, but no doubt once the LSD has worn off they'll be fine
I took a copy of my Install Yosemite image as I have three more Mac laptops and a Hackintosh to upgrade at some time in the future and downloading another 20GB is a bit of arse-ache.
I copied the install image to my NAS box for safe keeping and was surprised by the speed of the transfer. It moved the 5GB in around 70 secs or so. My normal performance on my NAS is abysmal for SMB I/II or AFP when using the Mac. Using a Linux box and NFS mounts is acceptable, but I have more or less given up on using the NAS for anything that is needed quickly when using the Mac.
The NAS is a Synology DS213+ with a two disk expansion box on. Its fully patched with the latest DSM software. I spent a long time trying to tune the Mac and the NAS for decent performance but came to the conclusion the Mac clients for SMB and AFP were ****e. NFS on a Mac is a joke, even with various paid for 3rd party add-ons I brought.
Anyway, simple file copying was very quick, since its so long since I used the NAS for anything like this I have forgotten what it was like.
So my intention is to benchmark my NAS with Mavericks on Macs, Yosemite on Mac, Maverick on Hackintosh and Yosemite on Hackintosh and see if it really has improved or I'm just remembering it falsely.
Since I'm going to do this in a more or less organised way (at least for me), I thought it would be useful for other people if they had the results. Whilst my contribution to the Tonymac forum is limited as my technical expertise lies in other areas, I'm more than happy to share the results here so it might help other people make informed decisions.
So the questions I have are:
1. What would you like to see benchmarked to make it useful for you. Simple file copies using the Finder? Large files, small files.
2. What software would you suggest using to help benchmarking. I'm familiar with Blackmagic and a German company whose name escapes me but who used to make Postscript software in the 90's (yes I am that old).
3. Suggestions on how to make sure the benchmarking is valid. e.g. clearing out buffer caches etc etc.
I'm happy to put a couple of hours aside to do this and report back the results. If there's no interest I'll do it for my own peace of mind.
I'm not keen to try and tune the performance at this stage. I want to test OOTB performance rather than hacking Jumbo frames together or unrealistic use-cases.
Your thoughts welcomed. For once not a plea for help
All the best,
Rob.
I've just upgraded my iMac to Yosemite. The iMac is the least most important Mac in the house and acts as a test rig, if it all goes pear shaped, nothing lost, so we upgrade the iMac first to check things out and see if Apple has gone mad anywhere.
So we upgraded to Yosemite, zero problems. Can't say I like the new colour scheme or the flat 2D icons, but no doubt once the LSD has worn off they'll be fine
I took a copy of my Install Yosemite image as I have three more Mac laptops and a Hackintosh to upgrade at some time in the future and downloading another 20GB is a bit of arse-ache.
I copied the install image to my NAS box for safe keeping and was surprised by the speed of the transfer. It moved the 5GB in around 70 secs or so. My normal performance on my NAS is abysmal for SMB I/II or AFP when using the Mac. Using a Linux box and NFS mounts is acceptable, but I have more or less given up on using the NAS for anything that is needed quickly when using the Mac.
The NAS is a Synology DS213+ with a two disk expansion box on. Its fully patched with the latest DSM software. I spent a long time trying to tune the Mac and the NAS for decent performance but came to the conclusion the Mac clients for SMB and AFP were ****e. NFS on a Mac is a joke, even with various paid for 3rd party add-ons I brought.
Anyway, simple file copying was very quick, since its so long since I used the NAS for anything like this I have forgotten what it was like.
So my intention is to benchmark my NAS with Mavericks on Macs, Yosemite on Mac, Maverick on Hackintosh and Yosemite on Hackintosh and see if it really has improved or I'm just remembering it falsely.
Since I'm going to do this in a more or less organised way (at least for me), I thought it would be useful for other people if they had the results. Whilst my contribution to the Tonymac forum is limited as my technical expertise lies in other areas, I'm more than happy to share the results here so it might help other people make informed decisions.
So the questions I have are:
1. What would you like to see benchmarked to make it useful for you. Simple file copies using the Finder? Large files, small files.
2. What software would you suggest using to help benchmarking. I'm familiar with Blackmagic and a German company whose name escapes me but who used to make Postscript software in the 90's (yes I am that old).
3. Suggestions on how to make sure the benchmarking is valid. e.g. clearing out buffer caches etc etc.
I'm happy to put a couple of hours aside to do this and report back the results. If there's no interest I'll do it for my own peace of mind.
I'm not keen to try and tune the performance at this stage. I want to test OOTB performance rather than hacking Jumbo frames together or unrealistic use-cases.
Your thoughts welcomed. For once not a plea for help
All the best,
Rob.
Last edited: