[SUCCESS] Gigabyte Designare Z390 (Thunderbolt 3) + i7-9700K + AMD RX 580

[Leesureone]

I actually removed it. I could have been an incompatible device all together. I got spooked and ran!

You know what they say, you can run but you can’t hide from USB.

 

[NorthAmTransAm]

You know what they say, you can run but you can’t hide from USB.

It will find you...

 

[FormerUser-50757]

Hey all,

Since MOnterey 12.3.1 and >=OC 0.7.9 im getting these kernel panics and spontaneous reboots. Seems to be related to the ethernet/wifi/bt.

Here's the report. I'm stumped - I've the got the EFI configured "stock" with HACKINDROM.

panic(cpu 12 caller 0xffffff80051044f0): __memcpy_chk object size check failed: dst 0xffffff9557fdf5a0, src 0xffffff86f0986094, (1024 < 1756) @subrs.c:606
Panicked task 0xffffff9089e95670: 344 threads: pid 0: kernel_task
Backtrace (CPU 12), panicked thread: 0xffffff954d44f000, Frame : Return Address
0xffffffd10204b7e0 : 0xffffff8005283e2d mach_kernel : _handle_debugger_trap + 0x41d
0xffffffd10204b830 : 0xffffff80053e3cb6 mach_kernel : _kdp_i386_trap + 0x116
0xffffffd10204b870 : 0xffffff80053d350d mach_kernel : _kernel_trap + 0x51d
0xffffffd10204b8c0 : 0xffffff8005223a60 mach_kernel : _return_from_trap + 0xe0
0xffffffd10204b8e0 : 0xffffff80052841fd mach_kernel : _DebuggerTrapWithState + 0xad
0xffffffd10204ba00 : 0xffffff80052839b6 mach_kernel : _panic_trap_to_debugger + 0x2b6
0xffffffd10204ba60 : 0xffffff8005b164bf mach_kernel : _panic + 0x84
0xffffffd10204bb50 : 0xffffff80051044f0
0xffffffd10204bb70 : 0xffffff80070bf1e8 com.apple.iokit.IO80211FamilyLegacy : __ZN18IO80211ScanManager8scanDoneEb + 0x104
0xffffffd10204bbe0 : 0xffffff80070a751f com.apple.iokit.IO80211FamilyLegacy : __ZN16IO80211Interface11postMessageEjPvm + 0x9a3
0xffffffd10204bc50 : 0xffffff80074112fb com.apple.driver.AirPort.BrcmNIC : _wlc_scan_callback + 0x5c
0xffffffd10204bc90 : 0xffffff800740eb3e com.apple.driver.AirPort.BrcmNIC : _wlc_scantimer + 0xb7d
0xffffffd10204bdb0 : 0xffffff80071ce3d6 com.apple.driver.AirPort.BrcmNIC : __ZL17wl_timer_callbackP8OSObjectP18IOTimerEventSource + 0x80
0xffffffd10204bdd0 : 0xffffff8005a4c6d5 mach_kernel : __ZN18IOTimerEventSource15timeoutSignaledEPvS0_ + 0xa5
0xffffffd10204be40 : 0xffffff8005a4c5d8 mach_kernel : __ZN18IOTimerEventSource17timeoutAndReleaseEPvS0_ + 0xc8
0xffffffd10204be70 : 0xffffff80052d71f5 mach_kernel : _thread_call_delayed_timer + 0x505
0xffffffd10204bee0 : 0xffffff80052d82c2 mach_kernel : _thread_call_delayed_timer + 0x15d2
0xffffffd10204bfa0 : 0xffffff800522318e mach_kernel : _call_continuation + 0x2e
      Kernel Extensions in backtrace:
         com.apple.iokit.IO80211FamilyLegacy(1200.12.2b1)[3D7E24FF-CEF0-3208-91F9-7FF6B620FCB5]@0xffffff8007010000->0xffffff8007154fff
            dependency: com.apple.driver.AppleMobileFileIntegrity(1.0.5)[2C07C501-6849-3156-ABBF-BBA8477F46E5]@0xffffff8006991000->0xffffff80069b2fff
            dependency: com.apple.driver.corecapture(1.0.4)[DBEB1C47-C51E-36D8-911F-B1C50A3A5A88]@0xffffff8008665000->0xffffff800867efff
            dependency: com.apple.iokit.CoreAnalyticsFamily(1)[0F3BD94F-E03A-3FB6-9EFF-154227A6DCC0]@0xffffff8006caa000->0xffffff8006cb1fff
            dependency: com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily(3.4)[62888EF4-277C-35B5-B9FA-DF8008BC5D28]@0xffffff8007b6b000->0xffffff8007b81fff
            dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOSkywalkFamily(1.0)[704F7BA6-0A24-3F85-9BEE-5932BA094DDD]@0xffffff8007ee2000->0xffffff8007f2afff
            dependency: com.apple.kec.corecrypto(12.0)[FEE26327-9979-30B0-ABEC-614507B4FEA8]@0xffffff800868b000->0xffffff800870afff
         com.apple.driver.AirPort.BrcmNIC(1400.1.1)[472C435B-6435-3F79-B70F-5D37D9FCA900]@0xffffff8007170000->0xffffff80076c9fff
            dependency: com.apple.driver.corecapture(1.0.4)[DBEB1C47-C51E-36D8-911F-B1C50A3A5A88]@0xffffff8008665000->0xffffff800867efff
            dependency: com.apple.driver.mDNSOffloadUserClient(1.0.1b8)[4FBA2427-9C02-3A92-B50D-9477FED500C7]@0xffffff8007dfc000->0xffffff8007e00fff
            dependency: com.apple.iokit.IO80211FamilyLegacy(1200.12.2b1)[3D7E24FF-CEF0-3208-91F9-7FF6B620FCB5]@0xffffff8007010000->0xffffff8007154fff
            dependency: com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily(3.4)[62888EF4-277C-35B5-B9FA-DF8008BC5D28]@0xffffff8007b6b000->0xffffff8007b81fff
            dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.9)[A436E92C-DE10-3718-AEF4-ED2A788A466A]@0xffffff8007e03000->0xffffff8007e2efff
            dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOSkywalkFamily(1.0)[704F7BA6-0A24-3F85-9BEE-5932BA094DDD]@0xffffff8007ee2000->0xffffff8007f2afff

Process name corresponding to current thread (0xffffff954d44f000): kernel_task
Boot args: keepsyms=1 debug=0x100 agdpmod=pikera alcid=11 shikigva=80 igfxfw=2 chunklist-security-epoch=0 -chunklist-no-rev2-dev

Mac OS version:
21E258

Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 21.4.0: Fri Mar 18 00:45:05 PDT 2022; root:xnu-8020.101.4~15/RELEASE_X86_64
Kernel UUID: B6F8637B-0844-355F-8C82-60FA06149384
KernelCache slide: 0x0000000005000000
KernelCache base:  0xffffff8005200000
Kernel slide:      0x0000000005010000
Kernel text base:  0xffffff8005210000
__HIB  text base: 0xffffff8005100000
System model name: iMac19,1 (Mac-AA95B1DDAB278B95)
System shutdown begun: NO
Panic diags file available: YES (0x0)
Hibernation exit count: 0

System uptime in nanoseconds: 66668603528627
Last Sleep:           absolute           base_tsc          base_nano
  Uptime  : 0x00003ca27e6e5813
  Sleep   : 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
  Wake    : 0x0000000000000000 0x0000001737092960 0x0000000000000000
Compressor Info: 0% of compressed pages limit (OK) and 0% of segments limit (OK) with 0 swapfiles and OK swap space
Zone info:
  Foreign : 0xffffff800b3b2000 - 0xffffff800b3c0000
  Native  : 0xffffff808a024000 - 0xffffffa08a024000
  Readonly: 0xffffff8556cf0000 - 0xffffff86f0689000
  Metadata: 0xfffffffbfffe9000 - 0xfffffffc207d6000
  Bitmaps : 0xfffffffc207d6000 - 0xfffffffc387d6000

 

[jiffyslot]

Just for my curiosity. What is the fastest and most powerful chip we can use with the Designare Z390?

I am rocking the i9 9900 ks currently, and I am guessing that is the top end but I could use a little extra CPU power from time to time.

A Silicon Lottery-binned version of the i9 9900KS? I had mine delidded, but it may not have been worth it since I'm going for stability.

 

[CaseySJ]

Hey all,

Since MOnterey 12.3.1 and >=OC 0.7.9 im getting these kernel panics and spontaneous reboots. Seems to be related to the ethernet/wifi/bt.

Here's the report. I'm stumped - I've the got the EFI configured "stock" with HACKINDROM.

...

Some questions:

• Do these crashes occur with OpenCore 0.7.8? If you have the OC 0.7.8 EFI folder, please try booting from it to confirm.
  • If the problem doesn't happen in 0.7.8, but it does happen in 0.7.9 or 0.8.0 then please do this:
    • Open both config files in OpenCore Configurator and compare each section, looking for any differences.
    • Alternatively, remove serial numbers from both config.plist files and post both 0.7.8 and 0.7.9 config files here.

 

[Leesureone]

It will find you...

Speaking of being found this is the board from the ASUS ThunderboltEx 3-TR. I circled the intel chip, the one to the right with the blue dot is hard to read. Both are down hard on the board, no legs on the chips showing I can see.

I’m guessing this version of the board isn’t a good candidate for flashing using a Raspberry Pi… (which I don’t even have yet but it’s in the mail).

What’s the prognosis Dr ROM?

 

[FormerUser-50757]

Some questions:

• Do these crashes occur with OpenCore 0.7.8? If you have the OC 0.7.8 EFI folder, please try booting from it to confirm.
  • If the problem doesn't happen in 0.7.8, but it does happen in 0.7.9 or 0.8.0 then please do this:
    • Open both config files in OpenCore Configurator and compare each section, looking for any differences.
    • Alternatively, remove serial numbers from both config.plist files and post both 0.7.8 and 0.7.9 config files here.

Thanks. I. haven't tried 0.7.8 with 12.3.1 yet, but might give that go! I'll compare the two config.plist file tonight and see if anything's wrecked.

 

[CaseySJ]

Speaking of being found this is the board from the ASUS ThunderboltEx 3-TR. I circled the intel chip, the one to the right with the blue dot is hard to read. Both are down hard on the board, no legs on the chips showing I can see.

I’m guessing this version of the board isn’t a good candidate for flashing using a Raspberry Pi… (which I don’t even have yet but it’s in the mail).

What’s the prognosis Dr ROM?

The flash rom chip will have only 8 pins, four on one side and four on the opposite side. It will also have a part number indicating whether it’s a MXIC (Macronix) chip or a Winbond chip. The only candidate *in the photo* is the chip on the left, not the one on the right. There may yet be another chip meeting these criteria…

 

[Chevron]

A Silicon Lottery-binned version of the i9 9900KS? I had mine delidded, but it may not have been worth it since I'm going for stability.

Yes it is off the shelf. Don't get me wrong it is a strong processor for what I do, just considering upgrade options.

I know the i9 9900 range are the top-end according to the lists of compatible processors; just a wondering if someone had success with the processors?

I guess I could go for a new motherboard and processor...

 

[Leesureone]

The flash rom chip will have only 8 pins, four on one side and four on the opposite side. It will also have a part number indicating whether it’s a MXIC (Macronix) chip or a Winbond chip. The only candidate *in the photo* is the chip on the left, not the one on the right. There may yet be another chip meeting these criteria…

Thanks Casey, none of the other chips seem to meet the criteria either, they are all flat down on the board and smaller with no visible pins.
EDIT: Well, foot in mouth time. No idea why I didn’t see this before even though it’s what I was looking for.