Contribute
Register

[SOLVED] Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080/1070

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
56
Motherboard
Dell 05FFDN (XPS 15 9560)
CPU
i7-7700HQ
Graphics
Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Disabled)
Mac
  1. MacBook Pro
  2. Mac Pro
Mobile Phone
  1. Android
  2. iOS
I feel most hacky users will either switch to ubuntu or windows if and when our current systems no longer function with macOS. I highly doubt all of a sudden we'll decide to fork out some stupid amount of money for the latest glorified iPad with a keyboard that apple releases under the MacBook Pro banner. It's Apple's loss at the end of the day, all the creatives are fleeing the sinking ship, I remember seeing them sign up in the first place, now I'm seeing the same with the surface studio pro.
We'll see what the next event brings, but I'm sick of them being boring and safe.

I think it's safe to say that most creatives have no clue what runs under the hood.
Apple hasn't been about "What's under the hood" for a good while now, yet they still seem to be quite popular.
For the IT professionals on the other hand, it's a whole different story. But most IT professionals don't care about Apple to begin with. I think a good majority of Apple users use Apple because they are either familiar with it's OS (it's what they have been using for years) or because they just want a shiny system with status. That's the truth. If we were here debating hardware and if hardware was the underlining reason for people jumping apple's gloriously thin and shiny ship, this would have been a discussion put to rest years ago. the "I use a Mac for the Adobe apps, i.e., PhotoShop, etc.," is really just a bunch of horse dung at best since it runs better on my Windows rig than it does on any apple rig to date. Give me one example of something you do on a Mac that couldn't be done on Windows. I'll wait. it comes down to personal preference and status. Although status has been hard to justify lately.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 17, 2016
Messages
71
Motherboard
GA-Z170X-UD5 TH
CPU
i7 6700k
Graphics
GTX 1070
Mac
  1. iMac
  2. MacBook Pro
Mobile Phone
  1. iOS
So 10.12.4 has just been released, and so have the newest Nvidia drivers. They still haven't moved beyond version 367, so no Pascal support.

I'm going to wait until the next desktop class GPUs are unveiled (in an iMac update or something) and then get the best version that can work with macOS AND Windows, and then sell this Nvidia card.

I'm glad I've been able to make use of the Intel HD 530, but it is gutless and I need to be able to work without lag in creative apps. Thought the 1070 would be killer, but looks like Pascal won't be working on macOS anytime soon.
 
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
56
Motherboard
Dell 05FFDN (XPS 15 9560)
CPU
i7-7700HQ
Graphics
Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Disabled)
Mac
  1. MacBook Pro
  2. Mac Pro
Mobile Phone
  1. Android
  2. iOS
So 10.12.4 has just been released, and so have the newest Nvidia drivers. They still haven't moved beyond version 367, so no Pascal support.

I'm going to wait until the next desktop class GPUs are unveiled (in an iMac update or something) and then get the best version that can work with macOS AND Windows, and then sell this Nvidia card.

I'm glad I've been able to make use of the Intel HD 530, but it is gutless and I need to be able to work without lag in creative apps. Thought the 1070 would be killer, but looks like Pascal won't be working on macOS anytime soon.

yeah, I wouldn't hold my breath for it.
I think it's pointless to hope for nvidia to release drivers that support their GPUs for an OS that that doesn't support their current cards. It's kind of silly to even think a company would waste time(money) and resources to help the "hackintosh" community. We could debate that the more OS support the more buyers, but lets face it. there aren't enough "hackintoshers" to justify that. Companies are focused on 1 thing and 1 thing only. Making money in a resourceful way with wasting as little of it as possible. Unless Apple suddenly decides to shift it's gpus back to Nvidia, which I for one think it will be very unlikely, don't expect any drivers from them that will support pascal gpus. it's just not how businesses do business.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
158
Motherboard
Gigabyte Z170 HD3P
CPU
i7-6700K
Graphics
Pascal Titan X
Mac
  1. iMac
  2. MacBook Air
Classic Mac
  1. iMac
Mobile Phone
  1. iOS
So 10.12.4 has just been released, and so have the newest Nvidia drivers. They still haven't moved beyond version 367, so no Pascal support.
There's something I really don't understand. NVIDIA said some months ago that they couldn't do the drivers without help from Apple. And it would be certainly understandable, because Metal is an Apple technology. However, there's something that doesn't parse: If NVIDIA knows how to write Metal drivers for Maxwell and all previous GPU generations, why wouldn't they know how to write them for Pascal?

Then of course comes into play the comment that has been repeated here a lot of times: NVIDIA won't release Pascal drivers because Apple asked them not to do so, likely because of an ultra-mega-million-dollar contract between both companies. And this doesn't make sense either. A contract for what? For Macs with discrete GPUs? How much is the market size of discrete GPUs Macs, not only compared to the Mac market, but to the whole Apple market?

Does Apple care for discrete GPUs? Tim Cook wants "augmented reality" because it's "more profound" (sic) than virtual reality.

So, if Apple doesn't care for discrete GPUs (and even if they still support some discrete GPUs in some Macs, they're just low-volume add-on options for some models, so no ultra-mega-million-dollar contract in sight), and if you also consider that NVIDIA knows how to develop Metal drivers for Maxwell and previous GPUs... what help from Apple do they need? Free coffee? Pizza?

Really, I don't understand what's going on here (well, apart from the Mac losing the professional market, which is the only easy to understand part here).
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
151
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-Z97X-GAMING 3
CPU
i7-4790K
Graphics
Sapphire Nitro RX 480 OC
Mac
  1. MacBook Pro
There's something I really don't understand. NVIDIA said some months ago that they couldn't do the drivers without help from Apple. And it would be certainly understandable, because Metal is an Apple technology. However, there's something that doesn't parse: If NVIDIA knows how to write Metal drivers for Maxwell and all previous GPU generations, why wouldn't they know how to write them for Pascal?

Then of course comes into play the comment that has been repeated here a lot of times: NVIDIA won't release Pascal drivers because Apple asked them not to do so, likely because of an ultra-mega-million-dollar contract between both companies. And this doesn't make sense either. A contract for what? For Macs with discrete GPUs? How much is the market size of discrete GPUs Macs, not only compared to the Mac market, but to the whole Apple market?

Does Apple care for discrete GPUs? Tim Cook wants "augmented reality" because it's "more profound" (sic) than virtual reality.

So, if Apple doesn't care for discrete GPUs (and even if they still support some discrete GPUs in some Macs, they're just low-volume add-on options for some models, so no ultra-mega-million-dollar contract in sight), and if you also consider that NVIDIA knows how to develop Metal drivers for Maxwell and previous GPUs... what help from Apple do they need? Free coffee? Pizza?

Really, I don't understand what's going on here (well, apart from the Mac losing the professional market, which is the only easy to understand part here).

Don't take things CEOs say at face value. "We need apple's help" can mean anything from needing actual technical help to "they don't make any hardware with our stuff in it or officially support any sort of eGPU solution, why should we care right now?". Encouraging people to 'show demand' to apple is just a way of getting some leverage against apple the next time GPU part negotiations come up. Nothing more.

Also keep in mind Maxwell isn't even officially supported. The web drivers make no mention of any Maxwell cards in their 'supported products' list. As far as Nvidia is officially concerned, they've been out of the mac game since Kepler.

Regardless of what their CEO actually meant, he is right in one way. The way video card drivers are designed in MacOS is not very friendly to third party offerings. The 'iBooks' bug is a direct consequence of some application security features in MacOS and I suspect it will only get worse and spread to more apps as time goes on.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
158
Motherboard
Gigabyte Z170 HD3P
CPU
i7-6700K
Graphics
Pascal Titan X
Mac
  1. iMac
  2. MacBook Air
Classic Mac
  1. iMac
Mobile Phone
  1. iOS
Also keep in mind Maxwell isn't even officially supported. The web drivers make no mention of any Maxwell cards in their 'supported products' list. As far as Nvidia is officially concerned, they've been out of the mac game since Kepler.

True, that makes the point even more obvious: They didn't need help from Apple for writing the Maxwell drivers, why would they need help for Pascal?

Your comment makes sense, though: The "help from Apple" sentence might really mean "Apple releasing products that use NVIDIA GPUs". Without such "help", the investment in developing the drivers might be unreasonable for NVIDIA.
 

WonkeyDonkey

Moderator
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
3,896
Motherboard
Asrock Z87E-ITX
CPU
i7-4770S
Graphics
GTX 760
Mac
  1. iMac
  2. Mac mini
Mobile Phone
  1. iOS
The Pascal market on mac simply does not exist. Even the last macs where you could physically fit such a gpu were officially discontinued in 2013. Why would they put resources into developing a driver for an OS that does not use or support the product ?
 

XQC

Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
132
Motherboard
GA Z170 UD3
CPU
i7 6770K
Graphics
AMD RX580
Mac
  1. MacBook Pro
Mobile Phone
  1. Android
It all stands and falls with what Apple has to offer this year regarding hardware upgrades. If there's something with Nvidia in it - yay. If not - I'll throw my money to AMD (hopefully).
 
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
508
Motherboard
Gigabyte Z270M-D3H
CPU
i3-7350K OC 4.5GHz
Graphics
RX 580
Mac
  1. MacBook
  2. MacBook Pro
  3. Mac Pro
Classic Mac
  1. Classic
Mobile Phone
  1. iOS
Unix. I use a Mac as a excellent Unix software development system. Till recently I could argue it was better than Linux. And no Adobe apps for me. And there are plenty of things Windows doesn't do for me (or even right.)

I think it's safe to say that most creatives have no clue what runs under the hood.
Apple hasn't been about "What's under the hood" for a good while now, yet they still seem to be quite popular.
For the IT professionals on the other hand, it's a whole different story. But most IT professionals don't care about apple to begin with. I think a good majority of apple users use apple because they are either familiar with it's OS (it's what they have been using for years) or because they just want a shiny system with status. That's the truth. If we were here debating hardware and if hardware was the underlining reason for people jumping apple's gloriously thin and shiny ship, this would have been a discussion put to rest years ago. the "I use a mac for the adobe apps i.e photoshop etc" is really just a bunch of horsedung at best since it runs better on my Windows rig than it does on any apple rig to date. Give me 1 example of something you do on a mac that couldn't be done on Windows. I'll wait. it comes down to personal preference and status. Although status has been hard to justify lately.
 

slim.jim

Moderator
Joined
Dec 17, 2014
Messages
4,221
Motherboard
MSI Z97 Gaming 9 AC
CPU
i7-4790K
Graphics
RX 5700 XT
Mac
  1. MacBook Pro
Classic Mac
  1. PowerBook
Mobile Phone
  1. iOS
I think it's safe to say that most creatives have no clue what runs under the hood.
Apple hasn't been about "What's under the hood" for a good while now, yet they still seem to be quite popular.
For the IT professionals on the other hand, it's a whole different story. But most IT professionals don't care about apple to begin with. I think a good majority of apple users use apple because they are either familiar with it's OS (it's what they have been using for years) or because they just want a shiny system with status. That's the truth. If we were here debating hardware and if hardware was the underlining reason for people jumping apple's gloriously thin and shiny ship, this would have been a discussion put to rest years ago. the "I use a mac for the adobe apps i.e photoshop etc" is really just a bunch of horsedung at best since it runs better on my Windows rig than it does on any apple rig to date. Give me 1 example of something you do on a mac that couldn't be done on Windows. I'll wait. it comes down to personal preference and status. Although status has been hard to justify lately.

I use Adobe apps in both. I find it much more productive in macOS. I couldnt careless about status, it is about what works best for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top