- Joined
- May 10, 2011
- Messages
- 2,923
- Motherboard
- Gigabyte B550 Vision D
- CPU
- Ryzen 5900X
- Graphics
- RX 6800
- Mac
- Classic Mac
- Mobile Phone
The advantage with Opencore is that it does seem to have far better memory and device management with macOS than Clover. With Clover despite it being seemingly simple to configure, the biggest problems were often memory and how it was managed. You didn't know whether to use Emuvariable64-UEFI or OSXAptioMemoryFix or any of its variants like OSXAptioFix3 or OSXAptioFix2-free2000, and then you had the SMBIOS issues on top. Now that I'm more familiar with Opencore, I see it took a lot more work and refining with Clover. That's not to say Clover is 'dead' so to speak - development is still ongoing for it and in fact it has now been updated for Monterey from what I heard recently.@Middleman,
Thanks for replying. Yes, that's one of the things I had to do... among many others. All works now, but I'm not sure there is any advantage of OpenCore 0.7.0 over Clover 5119 for booting my Gigabyte Z370N-WIFI system on High Sierra. Hours of problems with a net result of slower booting and that complex EFI folder. I have sea stories, but not worth using bandwidth since it finally works.
As it goes Clover can boot on Z490 Comet Lake with Catalina, but with the working configurations I've seen they are totally different compared to what a typical Z390 Clover setup looks like. Check this out (for example):
vs
Quite a difference, yes?