Contribute
Register

Post OS X Cinebench CPU and Graphics Benchmarks

Status
Not open for further replies.
El Capitan 10.11.1
Latest Nvidia Web Driver 346.03.03f01

My Results:


CPU Screen Shot 2015-10-23 at 16.37.17.png GPU Screen Shot 2015-10-23 at 11.45.21.png


Ran both tests twice.

EDIT:

New scores after overclocking to 4ghz

cinebench @4ghz.png
 
OSX 10.11.0

i7 4770K
Nvidia GTX 660 x2 (both running at x8 not x16)
GA-Z97X-UD5H
16 GB RAM

Slightly better fps than my Yosemite score but slightly lower cpu score.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-10-23 at 21.20.30.png
    Screen Shot 2015-10-23 at 21.20.30.png
    95.3 KB · Views: 157
i7 2600K
R9 280X Gigabyte Windforce 2
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-10-24 at 12.36.37 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-10-24 at 12.36.37 AM.png
    41.3 KB · Views: 120
I built this massive Hackintosh Mac Pro, but haven't decided on a graphics card yet. I am using Lightroom often - and only as a graphics-intense application. Curious how a better graphics card would improve the experience - now it's not bad at all.

I am using two Dell 2408 WFP displays directly on the motherboard graphics card.

Benchmark results:

two screens.jpg
 
I built this massive Hackintosh Mac Pro, but haven't decided on a graphics card yet. I am using Lightroom often - and only as a graphics-intense application. Curious how a better graphics card would improve the experience - now it's not bad at all.

I am using two Dell 2408 WFP displays directly on the motherboard graphics card.

Benchmark results:

View attachment 158406

Investing in a decent Graphics card would make a HUGE difference with your rig in my opinion. You are almost experiencing a bottleneck right now. Your cpu`s performance is great, but with an average of 70 fps + will make your machine so much better. The new GTX 980 Ti is a great card that will be good for at least 3 years. Depending on your budget.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top