Contribute
Register

Post OS X Cinebench CPU and Graphics Benchmarks

Status
Not open for further replies.
Post OS X Yosemite Cinebench CPU and Graphics Benchmarks

And I thought my Graphic card was not really good..
 

Attachments

  • Cinebench.jpg
    Cinebench.jpg
    119.7 KB · Views: 208
Post OS X Yosemite Cinebench CPU and Graphics Benchmarks

Fresh install of 10.10.4 on SuperMicro X9DAI, dual Xeon E5-2690's and a GTX 780
This is one of the most stable and almost stock installs I've done in many years. 3 injected kexts to enable USB3, HDMI Audio and of course FakeSMC. Clover UEFI boot loader using TonyMac's guide.
The GTX780 is driving 3 monitors with stock Apple Driver, much to my surprise
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-07-16 at 6.58.48 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-07-16 at 6.58.48 PM.png
    95.8 KB · Views: 164
Post OS X Yosemite Cinebench CPU and Graphics Benchmarks

Config : i7 5820K 3.3Ghz / Geforce GTX 970 4Go DDR5 /16Go Ballistix Sport
I have some problems with my GPU... score isn't good... have you any idea for solving it ? (i launch same cinebench on windows 7 and got 118.68fps score...)
Using Yosemite 10.10.5 with nvidia drivers 346.02.03f01 (clover installation with nvda_drv=1)
I also have lags using OpenGL / OpenCL acceleration in photoshop.
Thanks for help !

Capture d’écran 2015-09-22 à 22.42.06.png
 
Post OS X Yosemite Cinebench CPU and Graphics Benchmarks

Config : i7 5820K 3.3Ghz / Geforce GTX 970 4Go DDR5 /16Go Ballistix Sport
I have some problems with my GPU... score isn't good... have you any idea for solving it ? (i launch same cinebench on windows 7 and got 118.68fps score...)
Using Yosemite 10.10.5 with nvidia drivers 346.02.03f01 (clover installation with nvda_drv=1)
I also have lags using OpenGL / OpenCL acceleration in photoshop.
Thanks for help !

View attachment 152046

That is a really low score... I generally get about 110 fps which is still a little low but I know it is because the core clock doesn't boost like it should in OS X. It only goes to 1060MHz when running Cinebench and in Windows when gaming it boost to 1342MHz. I would install HW monitor and see check your core clocks to make sure it is ramping up at all.
 
Post OS X Yosemite Cinebench CPU and Graphics Benchmarks

That is a really low score... I generally get about 110 fps which is still a little low but I know it is because the core clock doesn't boost like it should in OS X. It only goes to 1060MHz when running Cinebench and in Windows when gaming it boost to 1342MHz. I would install HW monitor and see check your core clocks to make sure it is ramping up at all.

Slim.jin, i have installed HW Monitor but can't get infos about my GPU... only about HD and SSD... even when i configure it... can it be a FakeSMC.kext pb ?
Capture d’écran 2015-09-23 à 10.04.24.png


EDIT
I use multiBeast to reinstall fakeSMC + FakeSMC plugins + FakeSMC HW monitor and now getting all infos on CPU / GPU fans / voltage etc...
I'll try a new test in cinebench.

EDIT
Here is HW monitor during cinebench OpenGL test... (only got 55.27fps this time...) GPU core is at 1.1Ghz and GPU Memory 7.01Ghz.. so this i normal frequencies no ???
Screen Shot 2015-09-23 at 10.39.09.jpg
 
Last edited:
Post OS X Yosemite Cinebench CPU and Graphics Benchmarks

That is a really low score... I generally get about 110 fps which is still a little low but I know it is because the core clock doesn't boost like it should in OS X. It only goes to 1060MHz when running Cinebench and in Windows when gaming it boost to 1342MHz. I would install HW monitor and see check your core clocks to make sure it is ramping up at all.

Slim.jim i have opened a post concerning my GPU issues here : #1 if you have other ideas, take a look and reply there... i think it's better for everyone to keep posts organized :) Thanks for support.
 
Tested today using GA-Z87X-UD7-TH - i7 4770K - GeForce GTX 770

Result using OS X Native drivers:
Screen Shot 2015-10-19 at 11.17.19 AM.png

Result using NVIDIA Alternate drivers:
Screen Shot 2015-10-19 at 11.21.06 AM.png
 
Wow, didn't expect such a low FPS from this card and definitely didn't expect such a low score from the CPU, even if it is already a bit old. 2 cores? Should be 4 cores!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-10-20 at 00.58.05.png
    Screen Shot 2015-10-20 at 00.58.05.png
    43.8 KB · Views: 142
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top