Contribute
Register

My Prime95, Geekbench and Cinebench Results - Is this right?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 6, 2012
Messages
28
Mac
  1. 0
Classic Mac
  1. 0
Mobile Phone
  1. 0
First time OC, Got the system setup with a 43x multiplier (4.3 Ghz) with Intel Turbo Boost Disabled; RAM still running at 1333MHz (not at 1600). Ran Cinebench, Geekbench and Prime for 3 hours. I am running the system with the Corsair H60 Liquid Cooler on it.
Are these results okay and around what should be expected?
Cinebench
CPU - 8.39 pts (was 6.85pts without OC)
OpenCL - 64 fps (were 54 fps without OC)

Geekbench - 13037 (was 10626 without OC)
**I used the free trial version with 32bit only. Will 64bit tests make a difference? Should I get the 64 bit and what can I expect as my results from there or will 32bit suffice. Are these good results or not so good??

Prime95
Ran the test for 3 hours and at the end the results were:
Power - It went from 88watts (in first 20 mins) to about 98-100 watts for most of the time.
VID - 1.366 - 1.3711v
Temp - Max Temp was 66C (lowest was 25C).

Are these numbers too high for either Power, VID or Temp or they are good and I am on my way to a happy system?

As for RAM, I assume from what I read, chaning to XMP Profile 1 to get 1600 is not going to make a huge difference and for me I need 24/7 stable film/audio machine and don't want to cause any issues. What would I gain (or can expect) if I were to OC the RAM to 1600? or is it recommended I leave it as is.


What ya think?
Thanks
 
My BIOS CPU Vcore is 1.345v and set to Auto.
QPI/Vtt is 1.050v

Any value in setting the memory to XMP Profile 1 and run at 1600 or leave as is? Will I see a performance gain?

Thanks
 
is the system pretty stable at that? Do you see any performance gain from 1333 to 1600?
Thanks
PG
 
plexguy said:
is the system pretty stable at that? Do you see any performance gain from 1333 to 1600?
Thanks
PG

On Geekbench at 4.5 GHz my systems gets about 200 pts (15900 vs 16100) more when memory is running at 1600 MHz, no significant performance differences.
 
Using 16x mult for 1600Mhz memory speed increased GB by a couple hundred points if I remember right, in my setup.

o/c 4.4Ghz, @ 1600Mhz = 15,700 pts
 
Changing the multiplier to 16 in my bios boosted my geekbench score over 1000pts I believe. I did piddle with other setting but I'm fairly sure that the majority of improvement came from the RAM speed increase. I'm at ~13600 with no OC to CPU or graphics, I was around low to mid 12000 before.
 
Vcore is high should be in the 1.2x range with a higher x. I am at 4.2 and a vcore of 1.212. There is a chart that is very good but on iPad so can't upload but has the equation that I threw in logger pro to get exact numbers for oc. For 4.2 the min is 1.198 so I am just over it and for 4.3 I believe it's no higher than 1.26. This would get you lower temps and longer life of CPU.

Never mind you have a Xeon so I don't know for your CPU thought you had a 2600k
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top