Contribute
Register

Intel NUC 10 Frost Canyon

By the way, did anybody try Geekbench test on NUC10?
Can you share the results?

This post pushed me to try different device-id and framebuffers (look for 4.7. Phase VI - Graphics Injector / Testing values) because my results far more less:
Single core ~1100
Multi core ~5400
OpenCL ~4700
What's wrong with my/our setup? It's too big gap comparing to NUC8i7BEH
 
Last edited:
I don't have - I posted above that I solved this by injecting acpi-wake-type but it doesn't work for 0x9BCA for so far unknown for me reason.
The reason of post #214 is just informational - I wasn't solving by that any sleep/wake issues.
I've just wanted to say by post #214 that we in this thread are using spoof device-id indeed.

UPDATE: I don't use USBInjectAll.kext because I don't see the reason to have it - we have less than 15 ports and all of them are visible to OS both with or without this kext. Or I lack of some knowledge?
I only mentioned because I was having issues going to sleep with the kext in my EFI, as soon as I removed it they were gone.
By the way, did anybody try Geekbench test on NUC10?
Can you share the results?

This post pushed me to try different device-id and framebuffers (look for 4.7. Phase VI - Graphics Injector / Testing values) because my results far more less:
Single core ~1100
Multi core ~5400
OpenCL ~4700
What's wrong with my/our setup? It's too big gap comparing to NUC8i7BEH
What version of Geekbench are you trying?
 
I only mentioned because I was having issues going to sleep with the kext in my EFI, as soon as I removed it they were gone.

What version of Geekbench are you trying?
5.2.0 (downloaded fresh)
 
By the way, did anybody try Geekbench test on NUC10?
Can you share the results?

This post pushed me to try different device-id and framebuffers (look for 4.7. Phase VI - Graphics Injector / Testing values) because my results far more less:
Single core ~1100
Multi core ~5400
OpenCL ~4700
What's wrong with my/our setup? It's too big gap comparing to NUC8i7BEH
Geekbench 5: Compute OpenCL - 4792
Geekbench 5: Single Core - 1005
Geekbench 5: Multi Core - 5545

The CPU certainly has to do with the fact we are having to run the CPU Spoofing on the CPUID.
 
1592917498047.png
 
Last edited:
By the way, did anybody try Geekbench test on NUC10?
Can you share the results?

This post pushed me to try different device-id and framebuffers (look for 4.7. Phase VI - Graphics Injector / Testing values) because my results far more less:
Single core ~1100
Multi core ~5400
OpenCL ~4700
What's wrong with my/our setup? It's too big gap comparing to NUC8i7BEH

What do you mean by too big gap?

NUC8i7 is 4 cores and NUC10i7 is 6 cores.
 
- 5805 for Single-Core Score;
- 19602 for Multi-Core Score, respectively;
- whereas the GPU got 55110 as OpenCL Score!

That is a huge difference.

Do you follow Pavo-IM on GitHub?

He has a new program you should look at... OC Gen X

It creates a config.plist based on the Dortania Guide.
 
Do you follow Pavo-IM on GitHub?
Thank you for reference. I found it.
I will later give a test to it, I did my config basing on the same guide Pavo-IM refers to.
 
Back
Top