- Joined
- May 30, 2020
- Messages
- 96
- Motherboard
- Intel NUC10i7FNB
- CPU
- i7-10710U
- Graphics
- UHD 630
- Mac
- Mobile Phone
That's it! Somebody's guess.That's anybody's guess, right? as long it's not officially supported, we've to dig in a litte deeper
That's it! Somebody's guess.That's anybody's guess, right? as long it's not officially supported, we've to dig in a litte deeper
I only mentioned because I was having issues going to sleep with the kext in my EFI, as soon as I removed it they were gone.I don't have - I posted above that I solved this by injecting acpi-wake-type but it doesn't work for 0x9BCA for so far unknown for me reason.
The reason of post #214 is just informational - I wasn't solving by that any sleep/wake issues.
I've just wanted to say by post #214 that we in this thread are using spoof device-id indeed.
UPDATE: I don't use USBInjectAll.kext because I don't see the reason to have it - we have less than 15 ports and all of them are visible to OS both with or without this kext. Or I lack of some knowledge?
What version of Geekbench are you trying?By the way, did anybody try Geekbench test on NUC10?
Can you share the results?
This post pushed me to try different device-id and framebuffers (look for 4.7. Phase VI - Graphics Injector / Testing values) because my results far more less:
Single core ~1100
Multi core ~5400
OpenCL ~4700
What's wrong with my/our setup? It's too big gap comparing to NUC8i7BEH
5.2.0 (downloaded fresh)I only mentioned because I was having issues going to sleep with the kext in my EFI, as soon as I removed it they were gone.
What version of Geekbench are you trying?
Geekbench 5: Compute OpenCL - 4792By the way, did anybody try Geekbench test on NUC10?
Can you share the results?
This post pushed me to try different device-id and framebuffers (look for 4.7. Phase VI - Graphics Injector / Testing values) because my results far more less:
Single core ~1100
Multi core ~5400
OpenCL ~4700
What's wrong with my/our setup? It's too big gap comparing to NUC8i7BEH
By the way, did anybody try Geekbench test on NUC10?
Can you share the results?
This post pushed me to try different device-id and framebuffers (look for 4.7. Phase VI - Graphics Injector / Testing values) because my results far more less:
Single core ~1100
Multi core ~5400
OpenCL ~4700
What's wrong with my/our setup? It's too big gap comparing to NUC8i7BEH
What do you mean by too big gap?
- 5805 for Single-Core Score;
- 19602 for Multi-Core Score, respectively;
- whereas the GPU got 55110 as OpenCL Score!
Thank you for reference. I found it.Do you follow Pavo-IM on GitHub?