- Joined
- Jan 28, 2010
- Messages
- 233
- Motherboard
- ASUS X99-E WS
- CPU
- E5-2697 V3
- Graphics
- GTX 760
BobMc said:maffel said:Man, I so want to upgrade my x58 hackintosh with a x79 machine(Asus P9X79, 3930K).
The thing is that i'm able to get about 200 US Dollars off the original price if i buy the components before the 21'st of December. But the uncertainty of it all is not encouraging?
What would you do in my situation? Should i buy it and hope the next mac pros use Sandy Bridge-e?
After playing with the x79 for a few weeks, I decided to sell it and go back to my 2600K. With both CPUs running at 4.8GHz, the difference in performance between the two was minimal. I'm waiting for Ivy for my next upgrade.
The performance between the two is in no way minimal.
Sandybridge-E is about 50% faster by virtue of having 50% more cores. For an easy OS X build I would definitely not recommend socket 2011, but just because it is slow right now does not mean anything other than the software/your install is not supporting it properly.
An i7-970 scores ~10.7 when overclocked to 4.2-4.3GHz, while the 3930K can be overclocked higher and scores about 13.4 @ 4.8GHz.
That is a 20% improvement over one of the fastest reasonable choices for X58, and about a 35% improvement over a 2600K at 4.5GHz.
It seems like no one has really taken a stab at 2011 so far, but burying our heads in the sand is not going to make there be a better platform from Intel anytime soon. I agree X79 is underwhelming. But, just plugging it into a 10.6.8 hard drive hardly counts. I would like to see 10.7.2, SMBios of iMac12,1, and likely a patched kernel. Then that overclocked 3930K will be within spitting distance in renders (13.4 vs 14.3) of the 12-core 2.66GHz from Apple. (Cinebench 11.5)
Sandy Bridge-E will be the highest performing processor family from Intel for about 12 months, perhaps longer if Ivy Bridge-E is delayed. X79 will be the chipset in use for at least 24 (perhaps 30) months as Ivy Bridge-E will support it and there will be no reason to switch to the next one until a superior performing processor comes out. Sure, you might get a better motherboard based on this chipset in a year, but it will still be the same core chipset.
It would be nice to have an 8-core Sandy Bridge-E, but that is not happening, nor is an 8-core Ivy Bridge. Ivy Bridge is delayed yet again until Q2 2012 and is only bring quad-cores with a 17% increase in CPU benchmarks over Sandy Bridge clock for clock. That is less than we already have with both Westmere (i7-970) and Sandy Bridge-E (i7-3930K). The bottom line is that quad-cores simply can't stack up to a 6-core, so we need to get the newest and fastest 6-core working instead of waiting months for just another quad-core.
Ivy Bridge does bring a large increase in Intel onboard video and almost a 40% decreases in TDP. Unless you are worried about your electricity bill there is no reason you want to upgrade to Ivy Bridge. Westmere and Sandy Bridge-E are are the top performers now and they will be in 6 months when Ivy Bridge hits the shelves. You could wait until Ivy Bridge-E comes out, but that will be what--12 months? Luckily, those upgrades should be drop and lock with the same architecture and just 2 extra cores added.
This was rather long, but in summary--don't plan on getting Ivy Bridge. That won't be worth it. You either should be happy with an i7-2600K, or get an i7-970/980 for an extra 20% boost in CPU (and one that is a completely obsolete chipset), or get the i7-3930K working fully to enjoy a 40-50% increase over that i7-2600K.
Rant aside, did you have audio de-sync issues like how Sandy Bridge was originally? What about when overclocked?
I guess I will order some parts. Was hoping someone would post some promising information =/
Sources:
http://barefeats.com/wst10.html
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2205721
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/i ... _date_leak
http://legitreviews.com/news/11889/