Going Bald
Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2010
- Messages
- 22,390
- Motherboard
- GA-X58A-UD7-F7
- CPU
- W3670
- Graphics
- RX 580
- Mac
- Classic Mac
- Mobile Phone
Re: [Guide] MultiBooting for the novice.
If I were going to use 2 separate drives I would put OS X on the smaller one and Windows 7 and Ubuntu on the other. See Lifehacker's excellent guide for a Win7/Ubuntu install. While he used an older version of Ubuntu for his guide, you can substitute any version of Ubuntu and it will still work. http://lifehacker.com/5403100/dual+boot ... ct-harmony . He also uses a different method for the swap file which might be a better way of doing it than the traditional method I used here, especially if you have a large amount of ram.
It is definitely possible to get a minimally working OS X before going on to Win7 and come back and finish it later. In fact, you could do your partitioning, eject the OS X install disk, reboot and install Win7 first. Then come back and install OS X. Ubuntu, on the other hand, must absolutely be installed last.solstice said:Thanks very much for the guide!
Do you have any guess as to whether it's possible to follow through with the Win7 and Ubuntu parts of the install even if the Mac part is not fully working? I would guess that if partitioning and bootloader are ok, then you can install all OSs and then come back to fix/tune OSX?
I'm asking because I may not have time to do all of the tweaking I'll need to while getting the whole system up and running.
Also, I'm thinking of a 2 disk system (1 TB + 2 TB). Any recommendations as to which OS goes on which disk? I will probably create a shared data partition, which would be most of the 2TB.
If I were going to use 2 separate drives I would put OS X on the smaller one and Windows 7 and Ubuntu on the other. See Lifehacker's excellent guide for a Win7/Ubuntu install. While he used an older version of Ubuntu for his guide, you can substitute any version of Ubuntu and it will still work. http://lifehacker.com/5403100/dual+boot ... ct-harmony . He also uses a different method for the swap file which might be a better way of doing it than the traditional method I used here, especially if you have a large amount of ram.