Contribute
Register
Status
Not open for further replies.
Since you were having the same issue as me I though I would let you know that after updating to 10.14.5 my Bruce X result is now fixed, actually, it's the best score I ever had. 6 seconds max. :headbang: So it definitively was something OS related.

-------------------------------------------------------​

6 seconds average.
i7 8700k @5GHz
Vega 64 (Sapphire Radeon Nitro+)
16GB of Ram.
OSX 10.14.5
FCP 10.4.6

We I can clone and update I will. I wasnt going to since on my Macbook Pro I9 vega 20 updated to 14.5 it was slower than 14.4. I will now go ahead and try it with a clone and see what happens since you saw improvements.
 
i5-8600K at 4.5Ghz
16GB RAM 3000Mhz
Vega 64
iMac 18,3

Bruce-X 15.5 seconds for PreRes 422, 17 seconds for H264

Not sure if I'm running a little slow but all else considered I'm fairly happy with those results.
 
Skylake i5 6500 (3.2 Ghz), AMD RX 580 4GB, Samsung Pro 960 M.2 512GB, macOS 10.13.2, FCPX 10.3.4
Just under 19 seconds
Hello,
Have you updated your system to Mojave?
I've tried running Bruce benchmarks and I'm getting 30 seconds.

I have a really similar setup to yours (i5 6600k, RX570 4GB, 16GB ram, Samsung Evo 512GB).

Any ideas? I have both the Whatevergreen and the lilu kext up to date.

I don't use the intel integrated graphics (intel quicksync), do you think I should?

Would it be possible to have your efi folder please?

Thanks
 
Late to the party but thought I'd post here to keep a record as I tweak - not needed to do much in FCPX the last couple of years, as I'm mostly an audio only guy . . .
CPU: i5 4690k 3.4 GHz
ASUS z87 Pro mobo
Sapphire Pulse RX 580
16GB RAM
FCPX 10.4.6 on High Sierra

Bruce-X . . . 22 seconds, which ain't too shabby compared to some much newer builds. FWIW I may play with both my config and the BIOS memory allocation. Its now set to 64M for iGPU, but I've read it should be 128M - though others say this can crash FCPX. Time will tell :)
 
Ram: 32Gb Kingstone hyperx fury 1600Mhz
GPU: Saphire r9 280x 3GB ddr5
CPU: Intel Core i5 4690/ Quick Sync Enabled
Motherboard: Gigabyte H97M-D3H
SSD: Samsung EVO850 240Gb
MacOS: High Sierra 10.13.6



Final Cut Pro X: 10.4.3
Video Codec: Apple ProRes 422 (198mb)
Resolution: 5120×2700
Average time: 22.5 seconds

Final Cut Pro X: 10.4.3
Video Codec: h.264 (22.5mb)
Resolution:5120×2700
Average time: 33 seconds
 
Gigabyte Z370 Gaming 7
i9-9900K 4.7Ghz
64GB DDR4-3200MHz
MSI Radeon Vii
Samsung 970 Pro 1TB

Mojave 10.14.6
Final Cut Pro X 10.4.6
iMac19,1

ProRes 422 - 6-8s
 
Hi Guys,

I have not seen BruceX Scores better than 7s-ish, I was wondering if this was just coincidence or the test is too short for new systems. Wanting to upgrade to a 9900k system, but I recently got two RX580s to work in my old X79/4930k system.

Attached is an updated BruceX Test,
Standard 5k
5K X5 (which is just 5 copies of the original)
New 8k Version

My System (ProRes 422)
Mojave 10.14.6 | Final Cut Pro X 10.4.6
Bruce-X - 5K . <9s
Bruce-X - 8K . <20s
Bruce-X - 5K X5 >41s
 

Attachments

  • Bruce X.fcpbundle.zip
    2.7 MB · Views: 330
  • Bruce-X 8K.fcpxml.zip
    9.9 KB · Views: 242
Last edited:
Mojave 10.14.6

FCPX 10.4.6
32 seconds with Vega 20
14.5 with RADEON VII EGPU

FCPX 10.4.7
23 VEGA 20
10.3 with RADEON VII
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top