Graphics Test: Bruce X

[MyTech]

CPU: Intel Core i7 7700k
GPU: Gainward GTX 1080 Ti Phoenix "Golden Sample"
Mainboard: MSI Z270 Tomahawk Arctic
RAM: 16GB G.Skill Trident Z DDR4-3200
Wifi/Bluetooth: BCM943602CS
m.2 SSD: Samsung 960 Evo - 500GB
SSD: Samsung 850 Evo - 500GB

Result: 18 seconds

 

[rathahin]

MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6
Hackintosh Razer Blade Pro 2017
GTX 1080 8GB, RAM 32GB, CPU 2.9
BruceX Test 5K - 36 seconds

 

[jacky123456]

MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6
i7-8700k not OCed
860 Pro 500GB
GTX 1070 8GB, RAM 16GB
BruceX Test 5K - 31seconds

Got any idea why the render takes this long?

 

[DmitriZigany]

Got any idea why the render takes this long?

FCPX is optimized for AMD graphics cards so they are generally faster in FCPX than NVIDIA cards...

 

[SebErr]

i7 8700K - @4.9Ghz
Gigabyte Aorus Gaming 7
32GB G.Skill Ripjaw V 3200Mhz
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB NVME M.2 SSD
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8GB

High Sierra 10.13.6
FCPX 10.4.3

Result: 25 seconds (ProRes 422)

 

[tiqo]

MacOS Mojave 10.14 Beta 3
16Gb DDR3 - 1600Mhz RAM
i5-4460 @3.2GHz
Final Cut Pro X 10.4.3
Radeon RX 560 4Gb
BruceX Test 5K - 32 seconds

 

[qbe]

MacOS Mojave 10.14 Beta 3

can you do that test with same config and same fcpx version on High Sierra pls?

 

[Ariesheilaon7]

i7 7700K
NVME Samsung EVO 250 GB
32 GB RAM DDR4
High Sierra 10.13.6
FCP X 10.3.4
Dual AMD 7870 2 GB Reference
BruceX Test 5K - 20 Second

Not Bad

 

[tiqo]

can you do that test with same config and same fcpx version on High Sierra pls?

Never had High Sierra on this machine. I remember that the bruce-x test on "Sierra" took a little longer with the same specs.

 

[Malte]

I am impressed with my two old card

MacPro 5.1
MacOS 10.13.4 / FCPX 10.3.4
2 x 2,66 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
64 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
2x ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB

31 Seconds