Should I try this even if my board hasn't dual socket?ON X79 REMOVE ^UNC0 and ^UNC1 for dual socket as temporary solution in DSDT.
I'm going to try it out. While I was waiting for an answer I searched in my DSDT for UNC0 and UNC1, but there's any UNC1, maybe because mine is single socket, but I'm going to add both patches and tryI'am not able to create SSDT, but I'me able to make a patch which works but can use patches:
For C602 it works, may work on other X79.
DSDT UNC0 _HID to XHID
Find: 554E43 30085F48 4944
Replace: 554E43 30085848 4944
DSDT UNC1 _HID to XHID
Find: 554E43 31085F48 4944
Replace: 554E43 31085848 4944
UNC1 related to dual socket but I've think that there is not big problem.
So that approves that need only first patch for Single socket configuration. And you need only first patch. If it will not help You can share your dsdt with me and I will try to make a patch for you.I'm going to try it out. While I was waiting for an answer I searched in my DSDT for UNC0 and UNC1, but there's any UNC1, maybe because mine is single socket, but I'm going to add both patches and try
I tried both patches, but it keeps kernel panicking. Here is my DSDT:So that approves that need only first patch for Single socket configuration. And you need only first patch. If it will not help You can share your dsdt with me and I will try to make a patch for you.
No, I haven't this patch and it's the first time I see this. I'm gonna try this right nowIs patch applied (? I've tried create for you but is the same.
<dict>
<key>Comment</key>
<string>UNC0 _HID to XID</string>
<key>Count</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Enabled</key>
<true/>
<key>Find</key>
<data>VU5DMAhfSElE</data>
<key>Limit</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Mask</key>
<data></data>
<key>OemTableId</key>
<data></data>
<key>Replace</key>
<data>VU5DMAhYSElE</data>
<key>ReplaceMask</key>
<data></data>
<key>Skip</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableLength</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableSignature</key>
<data>RFNEVA==</data>
</dict>
Sorry to bother you, but proper tree says that the value of find and replace isn't hex, should I try it bypassing the warning?Is patch applied (? I've tried create for you but is the same.
<dict>
<key>Comment</key>
<string>UNC0 _HID to XID</string>
<key>Count</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Enabled</key>
<true/>
<key>Find</key>
<data>VU5DMAhfSElE</data>
<key>Limit</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Mask</key>
<data></data>
<key>OemTableId</key>
<data></data>
<key>Replace</key>
<data>VU5DMAhYSElE</data>
<key>ReplaceMask</key>
<data></data>
<key>Skip</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableLength</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableSignature</key>
<data>RFNEVA==</data>
</dict>