- Joined
- Aug 22, 2017
- Messages
- 390
- Motherboard
- Z390 Designare
- CPU
- i9-9900k
- Graphics
- RX 580
- Mac
- Mobile Phone
Here you go.Suggestion, install Intel® Power Gadget
Reply with a screen shot showing CPU/idle and running CPU/audio app(s).
Here you go.Suggestion, install Intel® Power Gadget
Reply with a screen shot showing CPU/idle and running CPU/audio app(s).
Utilization sucks, max power is far from 91 W rated, temps are marginally over "idle" and never gets to low power mode.Here you go.
Yeah, maybe the project I shared wasn't the best example, but that was a real world one. Here's a more synthetic one but puts a load on all cores. See IPG results now.Utilization sucks, max power is far from 91 W rated, temps are marginally over idle and never gets to low power mode.
Native CPU PM is not working
See macOS Native CPU/IGPU Power Management
My mistake, assumed Post #56 was Profile/7700K. Recognize both IPGs are 9900KSee IPG results now.
According to the thread you linked it appears that PM on 9900K isn't an option yet. Going off of this statement:My mistake, assumed Post #56 was Profile/7700K. Recognize both IPGs are 9900K
137W with 60% utilization is quite poor efficiency
CPU always in Turbo confirms native CPU PM is not working
Native iMac19,1/9900K IPG on your workload would be enlightening
Not a valid conclusion, IPG shows no non Turbo freqsI checked, I have a reasonable spread in clock speeds
No.Is this because of anti-meldown/spectre measures in Mojave?
Hyperthreading is not working, 16 "processors" should showinsights
Not a valid conclusion, IPG shows no non Turbo freqs
I'm hammering the CPU, so it goes full tilt for the time IPG was recording. When doing other stuff, I see more speeds.
No.
Hyperthreading is not working, 16 "processors" should show
Uh. I have a quad core/8 thread 6700K
Activity Monitor show 4 of the 8 physical cores are doing all the work, remaining 4 physical cores have no work