Contribute
Register

100 % Passive cooled Custom Mac

Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
135
Motherboard
Gigabyte Z370N-WiFi-F10-Clover
CPU
i5-8600
Graphics
HD 630
Mac
MacBook, MacBook Pro
Mobile Phone
Android
My best guess is that they haven't been able to produce reliable Metal compliant drivers.
Are you sure? We're talking about a company whose core business is graphics cards whose market cap is 115 US Billion which is 4xAMD's. AMD can write drivers for Mojave but your guess is that Nvidia cannot?

Seems to me the eGpu business is huge and Nvidia would not want to lose that. So the cost of compliance with Apple would have to be enormous to make it not worth Nvidia's time to get the drivers right. I don't really think so.

I personally think Apple is executing a corporate grievance against Nvidia for previous failures. Apple is not a normal company, pretty much everyone agrees that.

I have no evidence, but the accounts I've already linked make that seem plausible. Far more plausible than saying a 115 US Billion graphics company can't write drivers. Not saying you are wrong, but I've read no narrative anywhere supporting your thesis.
 
Last edited:

pastrychef

Moderator
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
9,014
Motherboard
Asus ROG Strix Z370-G Gaming (Wi-Fi AC)
CPU
i9-9900K OC'd @ 5.0GHz
Graphics
Vega 56
Mac
MacBook, Mac Pro
Classic Mac
iBook, Power Mac, PowerBook
Mobile Phone
iOS
Are you sure? We're talking about a company whose core business is graphics cards whose market cap is 115 US Billion which is 4xAMD's. AMD can write drivers from Mojave but your guess is that Nvidia cannot?

Seems to me the eGpu business is huge and Nvidia would not want to lose that. So the cost of compliance with Apple would have to be enormous to make it not worth Nvidia's time to get the drivers right. I don't really think so.

I personally think Apple is executing a corporate grievance against Nvidia for previous failures. Apple is not a normal company, pretty much everyone agrees that.

I have no evidence, but the accounts I've already linked make that seem plausible. Far more plausible than saying a 115 US Billion graphics company can't write drivers. Not saying you are wrong, but I've read no narrative anywhere supporting your thesis.
Well, the $115B market cap Nvidia has also not been able to produce 7nm GPUs while AMD, which is 4x smaller, can...

I don't see how not releasing Mojave drivers will help Nvidia with eGPU.

I don't doubt that Apple has grievances with Nvidia but that still doesn't give Apple any influence over what Nvidia does. For Ford hated Goodyear, does that stop Goodyear from selling tires that will work on Fords?

Last time I checked, Nvidia was still trying to hire coders for macOS drivers...
 

Adrian B

Moderator
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
7,541
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3
CPU
i7-3770
Graphics
HD 5570
Mac
iMac, MacBook Pro
Mobile Phone
Other
Are you sure? We're talking about a company whose core business is graphics cards whose market cap is 115 US Billion which is 4xAMD's. AMD can write drivers for Mojave but your guess is that Nvidia cannot?
Actually check out what Nvidia does in 2019 - it isn't the same as what they were doing in 2009

The following are all big business for Nvidia and far more profitable than the gaming sector alone;
Autonomous machines
Deep Learning & AI
Healthcare
Self Driving Cars
https://www.nvidia.com

Seems to me the eGpu business is huge and Nvidia would not want to lose that. So the cost of compliance with Apple would have to be enormous to make it not worth Nvidia's time to get the drivers right. I don't really think so.
eGPU is still very niche. Phones and tablets have been the biggest growth market for years. Intel are short of 14NM silicon for processors and even AMD is having problems getting enough 7NM

I personally think Apple is executing a corporate grievance against Nvidia for previous failures. Apple is not a normal company, pretty much everyone agrees that.
I don't doubt that there is still some bad blood. Business is very people focused - Wind up the wrong folk and it isn't going to be easy to sort out without concerted efforts. I don't think that many Tech giants are normal companies. Google, facebook, Microsoft, Nvidia, add in a few internet suppliers for good measure!

I have no evidence, but the accounts I've already linked make that seem plausible. Far more plausible than saying a 115 US Billion graphics company can't write drivers. Not saying you are wrong, but I've read no narrative anywhere supporting your thesis.
Yet we have never seen the great Nvidia media and marketing machine talk about, show off or promote Nvidia products using Metal or Metal 2 - If you can find anything positive here, I would love to see it because Nvidia has remained very tight lipped about any Metal support at all.

I wonder if Nvidia have more than two people that write/change existing drivers to conform to new build version of macOS Sierra/High Sierra now. There isn't any work for them to do so they probably get pulled off other projects for 5-10 minutes to make some quick 'update' changes.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
135
Motherboard
Gigabyte Z370N-WiFi-F10-Clover
CPU
i5-8600
Graphics
HD 630
Mac
MacBook, MacBook Pro
Mobile Phone
Android
Well, the $115B market cap Nvidia has also not been able to produce 7nm GPUs while AMD, which is 4x smaller, can...
Because it doesn't need to, apparently. But it needs to release 10.14 drivers or it loses money & goodwill.

Say Ford hated Goodyear, does that stop Goodyear from selling tires that will work on Fords?
Incorrect analogy. We're talking about components that require integration with the host system not chunks of rubber.

Choose a better analogy, maybe Ford's ECU (MacOS) and an EFI component supplier (Nvidia). I have no idea if open systems in ECU but for the analogy to be valid we can assume closed system. That is the whole point. Apple (Ford) has the keys to the car here, no one else.

Last time I checked, Nvidia was still trying to hire coders for macOS drivers...
No idea. Either way I personally don't think a 100B company would lie on its corporate website blaming another company for its own failings. If staff shortage is the problem, the website would say "drivers are coming". It doesn't though.

The following are all big business for Nvidia and far more profitable than the gaming sector alone
Okay, interesting. Given the size of the company I think it can still maintain its core competencies, but maybe not. In which case, the website message is a lie. I don't think so, myself.

I wonder if Nvidia have more than two people that write/change existing drivers to conform to new build version of macOS Sierra/High Sierra now. There isn't any work for them to do so they probably get pulled off other projects for 5-10 minutes to make some quick 'update' changes.
Maybe. More speculation though. What is not speculation is the message on the website and the lack of drivers for Mojave.

Fortunately for me, I use the igpu. Why am I even arguing? :banghead: I have zero investment in the outcome! :wave:
 

pastrychef

Moderator
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
9,014
Motherboard
Asus ROG Strix Z370-G Gaming (Wi-Fi AC)
CPU
i9-9900K OC'd @ 5.0GHz
Graphics
Vega 56
Mac
MacBook, Mac Pro
Classic Mac
iBook, Power Mac, PowerBook
Mobile Phone
iOS
Because it doesn't need to, apparently. But it needs to release 10.14 drivers or it loses money & goodwill.



Incorrect analogy. We're talking about components that require integration with the host system not chunks of rubber.

Choose a better analogy, maybe Ford's ECU (MacOS) and an EFI component supplier (Nvidia). I have no idea if open systems in ECU but for the analogy to be valid we can assume closed system. That is the whole point. Apple (Ford) has the keys to the car here, no one else.



No idea. Either way I personally don't think a 100B company would lie on its corporate website blaming another company for its own failings. If staff shortage is the problem, the website would say "drivers are coming". It doesn't though.



Okay, interesting. Given the size of the company I think it can still maintain its core competencies, but maybe not. In which case, the website message is a lie. I don't think so, myself.



Maybe. More speculation though. What is not speculation is the message on the website and the lack of drivers for Mojave.

Fortunately for me, I use the igpu. Why am I even arguing? :banghead: I have zero investment in the outcome! :wave:
Doesn't need to?!? I guess they don't need to release Mojave drivers either. Everyone needs to shrink die sizes. The only reason why Nvidia hasn't done so yet is because they haven't been able to. The same goes for Intel.

Fine, Ford can't stop someone like Edelbrock from releasing an aftermarket fuel injection system any more than Apple can stop Nvidia from releasing video cards (and drivers) for Macs. Any attempt to do so would be anti-competitive.

Well, if you are going to base what you believe on how high each company's market cap is, the $937B Apple said:
apple-on-Mojave-Nvidia.png

Core competencies? The $110B Nvidia couldn't fix a UI lag that was introduced with their web drivers for macOS 10.13.0 until 10.13.3 was released. Even then, the UI was never as smooth when using Nvidia cards when compared to IGPU or AMD GPUs. I would not be surprised at all if it turns out that all of this was indeed due to them not having Metal drivers ready. They have a history of failure when it comes to macOS drivers.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
801
Motherboard
ASUS Gryphon z87
CPU
i7-4770K
Graphics
HD4600 & RX580
Mac
MacBook Pro
Classic Mac
Apple
related (to the topic):
 

trs96

Moderator
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
13,244
Motherboard
GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK
CPU
i5-4690K
Graphics
HD4600 / RX 570
Mac
iMac, Mac mini
Mobile Phone
Android
related (to the topic):
It looks nice. Do they have an AMD graphics option for these ?
I would not be enthused about buying this and then having to follow a 22 step unboxing and assembly guide.
If paying this much money I'd expect it to be ready to use out of the box.

 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
801
Motherboard
ASUS Gryphon z87
CPU
i7-4770K
Graphics
HD4600 & RX580
Mac
MacBook Pro
Classic Mac
Apple
There seams to be a diy case available and a full built.
Anyways, I woulad rather built a full ATX than those mini stuff.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
801
Motherboard
ASUS Gryphon z87
CPU
i7-4770K
Graphics
HD4600 & RX580
Mac
MacBook Pro
Classic Mac
Apple
NOFAN CPU cooler Related :
Unfortunately, NOFAN cooler is not compatible with Intel i9 CPU.
Now we are running only CR-80EH, but it support TDP up to 80W.

If you'd like to use our cooler,
please consider other CPU such as 8th generation or 9th generation (i7/i5/i3 CPU without K)!
 

UtterDisbelief

Moderator
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
2,048
Motherboard
Gigabyte Z370M D3H
CPU
i3-8350K
Graphics
RX 560
Mac
iMac, Mac mini
Classic Mac
eMac, iBook
Mobile Phone
iOS
This is a really interesting thread. One thing that occurs to me though is that the goal of completely passive is hard to achieve given the way a computer is built. The components may indeed be passive BUT air still needs to move through their heat-sinks, or over surfaces, to dissipate heat.

Remember "still air" is one of the best insulators. Not good for heat removal. The trash-can MacPro is a hybrid design of chimney and fans. In no way passive but it's power to quietness ratio is because of the design.

So we need a temperature gradient to get air moving on its own. However hot components low down in a build will naturally warm-up everything else higher-up in the system due to convection and the time the machine is running.:rolleyes:

So logically the best way to go completely passive is a big, open chassis where no one component is above another, all set out in a slightly draughty room! How about the dining-room table with all the windows open?

Okay, okay. Scrub that and go back to the beginning!

:)
 
Top