Contribute
Register

Apple Announces "3rd Transition" for macOS: From Intel CPUs to Apple Silicon

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that the best solution for running Win32 apps on ARM based Macs will be a port of WINE.

Anyone remember this:
View attachment 477997

I never bought this but I did buy Connectix Virtual Game Station. Lol


Yes! I owned the original back in the day, before Microsoft bought it. (I still show folk screengrabs I made of it running MS-DOS on a PowerPC iBook, if I want to bore them!)

I think people nowadays are a bit blinkered about Intel-on-Intel, and forget that real abstraction-layers work, converting one architecture to another on the fly, and did so the best part of 18-years ago in this case.

The original Connectix Virtual PC worked very well.

i'm not technically savvy enough to know if Apple could prevent a similar app working in future. I hope they don't. I can see someone with the resources - like Parallels maybe - going this route.
 
Welcome to the beginning of the end, guys. Keep in mind that although Apple won't be making more intel based devices in 2 years, that doesn't mean they will stop supporting intel based devices in 2 years. I doubt they will make their shiny new Mac Pro obsolete so fast. We will be able to continue hackintoshing for a couple more years than that. But after that, yes... it's over.
 
I think people nowadays are a bit blinkered about Intel-on-Intel, and forget that real abstraction-layers work, converting one architecture to another on the fly, and did so the best part of 18-years ago in this case.

The original Connectix Virtual PC worked very well.

i'm not technically savvy enough to know if Apple could prevent a similar app working in future. I hope they don't. I can see someone with the resources - like Parallels maybe - going this route.

There was a program that made mac run on PC parts back 20 years ago. It worked kind of like a boot loader that translated everything at the assembly level "on the fly if you will". So someone could make something similar today, the problem back then was drivers and very limited hardware stack. At some point, someone would have to start creating drivers for non-apple hardware.

As for the windows side, I am not sure they said they would not allow windows virtualization, I think they said that Rosetta 2 will not do it. While it would be a shame that they do not allow windows virtualization I am fully prepared to just run two systems if needed and access windows side from remote.
 
Anyone remember this:

I never bought this but I did buy Connectix Virtual Game Station. Lol

Yup. I used it to test application installers, as it made re-imaging an OS back to a clean state a trivial exercise.
 
This makes me sad, but I expected it would have happened one day.

Fortunately I was lucky enough to be able to take advantage of the hackingtosh system in the early years of my career, when money was (and partly still is) in very short supply.
I had my hackingtosh since 2014, but it's starting to become obsolete and I'll surely buy a new machine somewhen early next year.

Considering my career is slowly growing, I think I'll be able to afford a decent ARM Imac, but I'm very annoyed because I also love playing PC games, a thing I can do without issues with my current hackingtosh machine.
If I go the legit-apple way, I'll have to own 2 computers to cultivate both my passions, while I currently have a machine that does it all.

Maybe I'll do an other hackingtosh early next year, to be used for about 4 years (how long I expect intel chips being supported); the amount of money I'd save this way would justify a slightly shorter longevity.

We shall see...

I'm torn, because as an absolute macOS lover I'm excited to see the future of the OS; I absolutely love where Big Sur is heading.
On the other hand my hackingtosh gave me so much...It's be sad to let go of this amazing system.
 
Last edited:
When Microsoft released its much maligned Windows 8, I abandoned Windows and switched to MacOS. I have come to like MacOS better and for the most part I like Apple's hardware. The problem, of course, is that if you want the OS, then you're also married to the hardware. And if Apple does something to the hardware, your only choice is to either accept it or switch back to Windows. Linux is just too limited for me in terms of applications.

In the desktop realm, this conundrum has been softened a bit by the hackintosh community. I can choose my hardware and run MacOS, too. But the days of the hackintosh are now numbered. And for those of us who are not able to justify $6000 desktops with $600 casters and $1000 display stands, where are we to turn? The non-upgradable all-in-one solution that is the iMac doesn't appeal to me. And the Mac mini doesn't really cut it. I thought my Herman Miller chair was expensive. But it's a bargain compared to Apple's Mac Pro.

Will Apple give us an affordable Mac Pro? That would go a long way toward solving the problem. The reason for joining the Hackintosh community is that you can build yourself an affordable computer with a name-brand motherboard and a quality power-supply, that is also user-serviceable and user-upgradable. What a concept! But that kind of common-sense thinking just doesn't seem to be part of Apple's philosophy. Everything is proprietary. Nothing us upgradable. And nothing is user-serviceable.

The writing, for me, is on the wall. If it's time for Apple to break with Intel, it's probably time for me to break with Apple. The problem is that I like the OS. And I like the integration with my iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch.

Maybe when the time comes I'll be making so much money that it won't matter. But even so, there's still something wrong with Apple's hardware philosophy. That's what made hackintosh building so appealing. And that's what I'm going to miss.
 
I just took apart my 2005 PowerPC Mac Mini and popped in an SSD drive to run some old apps on snow leopard - audio stuff. It's amazingly fast for its age and 1GB of RAM. I'm beginning to look forward to purchasing another RISC based Macintosh. Please make it something as affordable as the mini and fast enough to smoke any Intel based machine.
 
I am excited for this. I have ran a hackintosh for a number of years and on the whole I am satisfied with the value proposition/performance vs agro factor.

I think the move to dedicated silicon will permit Apple to release things not possible in the intel partnership. My only gripe is that I know that they are gonna rape my wallet for the privilege of owning one of these machines (which is why I built a hack in the first place!).

So now they need to release either a 27 inch imac with video input allowed - Target display mode - so you can use the built in Hi res 4K+ screen with an Intel NUC for the odd occasion I needed windows), or a smaller more home user orientated upgradeable tower machine that I can use a separate Dedicated screen on...

I suspect none of the above will happen however - shame...
 
Remember... Apple never cares about the feeling of Hackintosh users, and Apple does not need to.
 
Remember... Apple never cares about the feeling of Hackintosh users, and Apple does not need to.

It doesn't need to because there are a small number of dedicated Hackintosh users, and I'd be amazed if anything less than a substantial majority have a real Mac and other bits of Apple hardware. It certainly did care when Psystar started selling Hackintoshes to the general public.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top