ASUS X99 Boards - Big Sur (Not Compatible)

[byzyn4ik]

ON X79 REMOVE Devices ^UNC0 and ^UNC1 in DSDT for dual socket as temporary solution.

 

[Schlachtbank]

ON X79 REMOVE ^UNC0 and ^UNC1 for dual socket as temporary solution in DSDT.

Should I try this even if my board hasn't dual socket?
If yes, is there an SSDT that I can use to not touch my DSDT?

 

[byzyn4ik]

I'am not able to create SSDT, but I'me able to make a patch which works but can use patches:
For C602 it works, may work on other X79.

DSDT UNC0 _HID to XHID
Find: 554E43 30085F48 4944
Replace: 554E43 30085848 4944

DSDT UNC1 _HID to XHID
Find: 554E43 31085F48 4944
Replace: 554E43 31085848 4944

UNC1 related to dual socket but I've think that there is not big problem.

 

[Schlachtbank]

I'am not able to create SSDT, but I'me able to make a patch which works but can use patches:
For C602 it works, may work on other X79.

DSDT UNC0 _HID to XHID
Find: 554E43 30085F48 4944
Replace: 554E43 30085848 4944

DSDT UNC1 _HID to XHID
Find: 554E43 31085F48 4944
Replace: 554E43 31085848 4944

UNC1 related to dual socket but I've think that there is not big problem.

I'm going to try it out. While I was waiting for an answer I searched in my DSDT for UNC0 and UNC1, but there's any UNC1, maybe because mine is single socket, but I'm going to add both patches and try

 

[byzyn4ik]

I'm going to try it out. While I was waiting for an answer I searched in my DSDT for UNC0 and UNC1, but there's any UNC1, maybe because mine is single socket, but I'm going to add both patches and try

So that approves that need only first patch for Single socket configuration. And you need only first patch. If it will not help You can share your dsdt with me and I will try to make a patch for you.

 

[Schlachtbank]

So that approves that need only first patch for Single socket configuration. And you need only first patch. If it will not help You can share your dsdt with me and I will try to make a patch for you.

I tried both patches, but it keeps kernel panicking. Here is my DSDT:

 

[byzyn4ik]

Is patch applied (? I've tried create for you but is the same.


<dict>
<key>Comment</key>
<string>UNC0 _HID to XID</string>
<key>Count</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Enabled</key>
<true/>
<key>Find</key>
<data>VU5DMAhfSElE</data>
<key>Limit</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Mask</key>
<data></data>
<key>OemTableId</key>
<data></data>
<key>Replace</key>
<data>VU5DMAhYSElE</data>
<key>ReplaceMask</key>
<data></data>
<key>Skip</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableLength</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableSignature</key>
<data>RFNEVA==</data>
</dict>

 

[Schlachtbank]

Is patch applied (? I've tried create for you but is the same.


<dict>
<key>Comment</key>
<string>UNC0 _HID to XID</string>
<key>Count</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Enabled</key>
<true/>
<key>Find</key>
<data>VU5DMAhfSElE</data>
<key>Limit</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Mask</key>
<data></data>
<key>OemTableId</key>
<data></data>
<key>Replace</key>
<data>VU5DMAhYSElE</data>
<key>ReplaceMask</key>
<data></data>
<key>Skip</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableLength</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableSignature</key>
<data>RFNEVA==</data>
</dict>

No, I haven't this patch and it's the first time I see this. I'm gonna try this right now

 

[Schlachtbank]

Is patch applied (? I've tried create for you but is the same.


<dict>
<key>Comment</key>
<string>UNC0 _HID to XID</string>
<key>Count</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Enabled</key>
<true/>
<key>Find</key>
<data>VU5DMAhfSElE</data>
<key>Limit</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>Mask</key>
<data></data>
<key>OemTableId</key>
<data></data>
<key>Replace</key>
<data>VU5DMAhYSElE</data>
<key>ReplaceMask</key>
<data></data>
<key>Skip</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableLength</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>TableSignature</key>
<data>RFNEVA==</data>
</dict>

Sorry to bother you, but proper tree says that the value of find and replace isn't hex, should I try it bypassing the warning?

 

[byzyn4ik]

this is raw view, you can insert them via text editor. Send me a config. I will check.