- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 302
- Motherboard
- Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING
- CPU
- i7-10700K
- Graphics
- Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Mac
- Classic Mac
- Mobile Phone
Couldn't agree more. I'm kinda upset by this. If I wanted an iPad I'd freaking buy one. I'm also not happy because it appears that they are going to start pulling the same crap that they do with their phones where they don't give you specifics on the CPU cores and clock speeds. If you look at the screenshot that marko96 posted earlier, you will see how one can come to this conclusion. All it says is 'Apple A12Z Bionic', not something like '2.49Ghz 8-Core Apple A12Z Bionic'.the name big sur
is absurd
i remember when craig said
no we are not merging mac os and ios
yeah right
today
we brought control center to the mac
i understand changes and moving foward
but it doesn’t feel like a desktop os anymore
more like the begining of an hybrid
for those who like it i have no objection, if only we will have nvidia support
but that is gone, now it seems like mac os is the next one in the hit list
awesome job mr cook
keep it up and you will end up driving all your mac users away
mr cook you just destroyed mac os
congratulations
Does anyone else think this is lame? If they don't tell us the clock speed and core count when we go to buy a new Mac, how does one know if it will run the kind of apps some of us need every day? Such as video editing software or music production software. Some people need serious power and not giving spec details keeps us in the dark. Yeah, we can probably search on some third party site how many cores the Mac we're looking at has, but we shouldn't have to.
They really are just making the Mac a big mobile-like toy now. Windows users already think macOS looks like a toy OS, wait until they see Big Sur. I hope enough people complain to maybe make them rethink the GUI. Good luck with that, though. Doubt Apple cares.