Graphics Test: Bruce X

[Malte]

MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6
i7-8700k not OCed
860 Pro 500GB
GTX 1070 8GB, RAM 16GB
BruceX Test 5K - 31seconds

Got any idea why the render takes this long?

Cause Nvdia Cards are good with CUDA but not with OpenCL - you will get great performance with DaVinci Resolve

 

[iMCool]

My Results:
macOS Mojave Beta 5
Core i7 6700k stock 4.2Ghz
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB
RX Vega 64 XTX
G.Skill 32GB @ 3200Mhz
FCPX - 10.4.3

Time: 12.87 seconds (ProRes 422)
Time: 18.41 seconds (H.264)

 

[MPXStudios]

My Results:
Mac OS v10.13.6 beta FCP v10.4.3
Mid 2010 Mac Pro
3.33, 32 GB Ram, RX580 8GB GPU
Time: 35 Seconds

 

[Suney]

My Results:
Mac OS v10.13.6
FCP v10.4.3
i5 8400 coffeelake
16gb Ram
RX560 2gb sapphirepulse
Time: 37 Seconds

 

[Fordski]

For those of you experiencing slow times I was experiencing slow times for my Sapphire Radeon Pulse RX580 (56 secs) so I did a little experimenting under the assumption the IGPU was being used alone in this test. I changed the device ID in properties to Ox3E910003 (from which is a connectorless ID for Coffee Lake from post #2 in https://www.tonymacx86.com/threads/guide-intel-framebuffer-patching-using-whatevergreen.256490/

My times were reduced to 14 seconds while still preserving Quicksync and Airplay etc. I'm still learning about how all this works so I'm interested in any comments about what is happening here. I'm currently using the new versions on Lilu and Whatevergreen.....

 

[carlocarnev]

So I have tried with this:
i5-4690K (NON OC)
GTX-970
Crucial 8GB 1600
Samsung 850 Evo 128gb
And I got 42 seconds exporting in Pro Res 422 with FCPX 10.4.3 on High Sierra 10.13.6
Should I be disappointed or happy with this result?
Should I edit with FCPX or Davinci Resolve for better performance?
Thanks in advance for the answers!

 

[edohikmah]

i9-7980XE @4.5Ghz All core
4x8Gb DDR4 @3200Mhz
NVME 970 EVO 480Gb
Radeon RX Vega 64
Mojave DP11
FCPX 10.4.3
BruceX Test-5K : 11.76 Sec

 

[volcan96]

For those of you experiencing slow times I was experiencing slow times for my Sapphire Radeon Pulse RX580 (56 secs) so I did a little experimenting under the assumption the IGPU was being used alone in this test. I changed the device ID in properties to Ox3E910003 (from which is a connectorless ID for Coffee Lake from post #2 in https://www.tonymacx86.com/threads/guide-intel-framebuffer-patching-using-whatevergreen.256490/

My times were reduced to 14 seconds while still preserving Quicksync and Airplay etc. I'm still learning about how all this works so I'm interested in any comments about what is happening here. I'm currently using the new versions on Lilu and Whatevergreen.....

Thank you for this. My speeds went from ~50 secs to about 12 secs after changing this. Additionally, my itunes DRM files started playing as well (not sure this is related or not)

 

[aceyyoung]

Can you please share your EFI? I am still struggling to get the FCPX to workwithout without freeze my system.

For those of you experiencing slow times I was experiencing slow times for my Sapphire Radeon Pulse RX580 (56 secs) so I did a little experimenting under the assumption the IGPU was being used alone in this test. I changed the device ID in properties to Ox3E910003 (from which is a connectorless ID for Coffee Lake from post #2 in https://www.tonymacx86.com/threads/guide-intel-framebuffer-patching-using-whatevergreen.256490/

My times were reduced to 14 seconds while still preserving Quicksync and Airplay etc. I'm still learning about how all this works so I'm interested in any comments about what is happening here. I'm currently using the new versions on Lilu and Whatevergreen.....

 

[Fordski]

Can you please share your EFI? I am still struggling to get the FCPX to workwithout without freeze my system.

Sure I can do that. Unfortunately I’m away (visiting a great place Tequisquiapan in Mexico) and not with my computer. I’ll be back in a couple of days.