Final Cut Pro X FCPX Graphic Card performance

[lakeone]

Gigabyte HD 7950: 37 Seconds Bruce X

MacPro 5.1 Original
48 GB RAM
2 x Intel Xeon 5675 12 Core 3 GHZ

 

[balonchiks]

Motherboard: Gigabyte H110M-S2H
Ram: 16Gb (2x8)
Macos: Sierra 10.12.6

Nvidia GeForce 9400GT: 74 seconds
EVGA GeForce 1060 GTX 6GB: 32 seconds

 

[jhenu]

Bruce X 5K Test with "Background Render is OFF" Time is 30 Seconds.
MotherBoard: MSI H170i Pro AC
CPU: Intel i5 6600
RAM :16GB DDR4 2100 Mhz
Integrated GPU: Enabled
Disk : M.2 ACHI SSD+
Sierra 10.12.3
FCPX 10.2.1
Graphics Card is RX580 4GB Version.
I feel its very low, can some one guide me towards getting better scores?

 

[khriswithak]

Can't wait to see what the Bruce X results are for the new AMD RX Vega cards. Here's to hoping it crushes the old 280x results.

 

[jairfonseca]

MotherBoard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H
CPU: Intel i7 4790K
RAM: 32GB DDR3 2400 Mhz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6143 MB
Disk: SSD Crucial MX300 525Gb

macOS Sierra 10.12: 25Sec
macOS Sierra 10.12.6: 41Sec

 

[khriswithak]

MotherBoard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H
CPU: Intel i7 4790K
RAM: 32GB DDR3 2400 Mhz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6143 MB
Disk: SSD Crucial MX300 525Gb

macOS Sierra 10.12: 25Sec
macOS Sierra 10.12.6: 41Sec

Wondering what scores will look like in High Sierra.

 

[pastrychef]

My BruceX results:

macOS Sierra 10.12.6
Final Cut Pro 10.3.4
Maximus VIII Gene
i7-7700K @ 5.1GHz, 64GB, GTX 1080
Time: 14 seconds

 

[rna23]

Hi,

I upgraded my GPU from Radeon HD 7970 to Nvidia GTX 980Ti as I heard it should be much faster.
But the reality is different. The BruceX 5k gave me 31s with the 7970 and 52s with the GTX 980Ti.

I have read somewhere that there should be a vast (about 200%) improvement in the GTX performance with upgrading Sierra from 10.12.3 to 10.12.4 ... and so I upgraded to 10.12.6 and the performance went up by 27% but not 200% ...

Is there anybody who knows how to improve the GTX 980Ti performance? I suppose there must be something wrong ...

I also don't know if the results posted from other users come from the 5K version of the test or not ...

 

[rohith]

Hi,

I upgraded my GPU from Radeon HD 7970 to Nvidia GTX 980Ti as I heard it should be much faster.
But the reality is different. The BruceX 5k gave me 31s with the 7970 and 52s with the GTX 980Ti.

I have read somewhere that there should be a vast (about 200%) improvement in the GTX performance with upgrading Sierra from 10.12.3 to 10.12.4 ... and so I upgraded to 10.12.6 and the performance went up by 27% but not 200% ...

Is there anybody who knows how to improve the GTX 980Ti performance? I suppose there must be something wrong ...

I also don't know if the results posted from other users come from the 5K version of the test or not ...

hi related to main FCPX usage the AMD gpus are much better than nvidia...

 

[rna23]

hi related to main FCPX usage the AMD gpus are much better than nvidia...

Acutally this is well known, but I have seen many reports of high performance results with the GTX 980Ti. So my results seem to be quite strange. When You look into Compubench, You will see that in OpenCL the GTX 980Ti is one of the best GPU's and should beat the 7970 by 1.7x. When You run LuxMark, the GTX980Ti gets better results by 32%, compared to the Radeon 7970.