1. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    27
    System
    windows xp
    CPU
    core 2 duo
    Graphics
    radeon hd 4850
    Online
    hypermiler is offline
    #1

    i33225 versus i53570K for non-gaming hackintosh


    I am debating back and forth between these two processors because I am building a hackintosh for someone who won't be doing any heavy 3-D gaming. It will mainly be used for Internet, wordprocessing, photo editing, and movie watching. The difference in price for the system is about $65 (370 versus 435), which is significant given they are on a budget. I don't want to make them spend more money if the difference in day to day use is negligible. So far I have not seen many reviews or discussions comparing these two processors. The system already includes an SSD. I would favor the i5 given that I am going with the z77ma-g45 MSI board and would therefore have ability to overclock if needed, further future proofing the build. If you are curious here is my build so far:

    CPU: 3225 vs 3570k - need HD4000
    Mobo: MSI z77
    HD: Kingston hyperx 120gig
    RAM: GSkill ripjaw 4gb x 2
    Case: cheapest microATX case from apex @ newegg (one with handle on top)
    PSU: corsair cx430

  2.   
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    13
    System
    OS X 10.8.4
    CPU
    Core i3-3225
    Graphics
    Intel HD 4000
    Geekbench Score
    7600
    Online
    JamesK is offline
    iPhone Phone (other) MacBook PowerMac
    #2

    i33225 versus i53570K for non-gaming hackintosh


    I don't understand why you contemplate. The i3-3225 is plenty for regular non-gaming use, go with the 3225!

    Also, I suggest a PicoPSU for that build. Always a good choice for systems without a dedicated GPU card.

    Good luck :-)

  3. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    27
    System
    windows xp
    CPU
    core 2 duo
    Graphics
    radeon hd 4850
    Online
    hypermiler is offline
    #3

    i33225 versus i53570K for non-gaming hackintosh


    I agree with you, certainly the lower end processor is more than enough for the required tasks. However I'd like to know if the extra cost associated with the higher end processor would translate to any noticeable improvement in performance now, as well as provide some extra longevity for the system. Even if there was a small but noticeable difference and the computer gained an extra year of use I think that would be worth the extra $65. Of course longevity is always hard to predict and other components may fail before the CPU does, but has anyone used both of these processors enough to say that the i5 boots up a little bit faster or loads programs a little quicker? This may include some mild overclocking. If there's absolutely no real world difference other than benchmark program scores, then obviously I will opt for the i3.

  4. Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,348
    System
    GA-X58A-UD7
    CPU
    i7-920
    Graphics
    Sapphire HD5770
    Online
    Going Bald is offline
    iMac Mac Mini iMac
    #4

    i33225 versus i53570K for non-gaming hackintosh


    Quote Originally Posted by hypermiler View Post
    I agree with you, certainly the lower end processor is more than enough for the required tasks. However I'd like to know if the extra cost associated with the higher end processor would translate to any noticeable improvement in performance now, as well as provide some extra longevity for the system. Even if there was a small but noticeable difference and the computer gained an extra year of use I think that would be worth the extra $65. Of course longevity is always hard to predict and other components may fail before the CPU does, but has anyone used both of these processors enough to say that the i5 boots up a little bit faster or loads programs a little quicker? This may include some mild overclocking. If there's absolutely no real world difference other than benchmark program scores, then obviously I will opt for the i3.
    For every day use you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between them. Only if you start using benchmarking apps, and even then, there won't be much difference unless you OC the i5.

    EDIT: Now that the Gigabyte ITX boards are out you might want to look at pairing the H77N with the i3 3225.

  5. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    27
    System
    windows xp
    CPU
    core 2 duo
    Graphics
    radeon hd 4850
    Online
    hypermiler is offline
    #5

    i33225 versus i53570K for non-gaming hackintosh


    Hmmm, so i3 it is. So i5 is really just for gaming and what else? Video processing? Sounds too much of a price premium if you can't see it's benefits in general usage. Even mildly overclocked there's no difference?

    In regards to the GA mini ITX boards, I'd love to use them but they are just so expensive. MSI board is $65 after rebate for me. Unless you can point me to a cheap ITX price, I can't afford it. Do they offer anything more in terms of features over the Z77ma-g45? I am building system to a price and trying to reserve budget space for more bang for buck add ons such as a regular HD when they run out of space on the SSD.

    Btw, what are peoples recommendations for cheapest yet good Mac keyboard? Are windows keyboards fine? Does the magic trackpad replace a mouse or is it a specialty/gimmicky item?

  6. Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,348
    System
    GA-X58A-UD7
    CPU
    i7-920
    Graphics
    Sapphire HD5770
    Online
    Going Bald is offline
    iMac Mac Mini iMac
    #6

    i33225 versus i53570K for non-gaming hackintosh


    Quote Originally Posted by hypermiler View Post
    Btw, what are peoples recommendations for cheapest yet good Mac keyboard? Are windows keyboards fine? Does the magic trackpad replace a mouse or is it a specialty/gimmicky item?
    I use Apple aluminum keyboards on 2 hacks and a Logitech K750 on a third. All work fine. Don't know about the trackpad, as I have never owned one. Windows USB keyboards are OK and will work, you just have to remember that the ALT and Command (Windows Flag) keys are swapped on a Windows keyboard - instead of control - alt - command it would be control - command - alt

  7.   
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,024
    System
    GA-Z77X-UP5 TH, -Z77-D3H, -H77N-WIFI, and Macs
    CPU
    i7-3770K, i7-3770, i3-3225, i7-620M
    Graphics
    HD4000 / GTX650 / GT440 / GT330M
    Geekbench Score
    16839
    Online
    DBP is offline
    Android Phone iPhone iMac MacBook MacBook Pro Mac Mini Mac Pro eMac iBook iMac PowerMac PowerBook
    #7

    i33225 versus i53570K for non-gaming hackintosh


    Just for anyone still wondering about such things, I went cheap on my first build (destined for HTPC after I've finished playing) and used an i3-3225 (build post probably coming this weekend).

    This thing blows away my 2010 i7 MacBook Pro in Geekbench. And I've still got some tuning I can do on it (like I said, build post coming later). Now I'm really looking forward to what the i7-3770(K?) can do in my workstation build!

    In short, the i3-3225 is no slouch.

  8.   
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,324
    System
    P8Z77-M-PRO
    CPU
    i5 3570k
    Graphics
    ASUS GTX 650 TI Boost 2GB
    Geekbench Score
    10700
    Online
    hacman is offline
    iPhone iMac
    #8

    i33225 versus i53570K for non-gaming hackintosh


    Gigabyte GA-H61N-D2V + i3 3225
    i3-3220 -Z77 E-ITX - ZOTAC GTX 650 1gb - Mountain Lion 10.8.4

    My MiNi ITX Build
    : Core i5 3570 - H77N-WiFi - MSI N450 GTS - CM Elite 120

  9. Similar Threads: